Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64"
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 109286
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail=_65A1862A-9A81-4A9C-8266-8547D60536CBContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/plain;charset=us-asciiAlmost 4 years on and the only encryption/decryption that you can do =with cookies is method=3DBase64, and I have just spent 2 days proving it =:(Thinking of opening a liquor store ..... problem is it may be like =Dracula in charge of the Blood BankOn 28/10/2008, at 1:42 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:> On 28/10/2008, at 1:11 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:>=20>> Hi Matthew,>>=20>> I tested WebDNA and learned that it won't produce [math]>> results more than 15 chars long before it resorts to>> scientific notation, and therefore it appears your>> suggestion is not possible ... :(>>=20>> I also did a bunch of reading online about prime numbers>> (very interesting) but none of it matters for use in WebDNA>> if the [math] context cannot produce numbers more than 15>> chars long.>>=20>> It sure would be nice if encrypt / decrypt worked with>> cookies, and I'm not sure why it doesn't when it works with>> db's. Any theories about this?>>=20>> Sincerely,>> Ken Grome--Apple-Mail=_65A1862A-9A81-4A9C-8266-8547D60536CBContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/html;charset=us-asciiAlmost 4 years on and the only encryption/decryption that you can do =with cookies is method=3DBase64, and I have just spent 2 days proving it =:(
Thinking of opening a liquor store ..... problem =is it may be like Dracula in charge of the Blood =Bank
=On 28/10/2008, at 1:42 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:
On =28/10/2008, at 1:11 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I tested WebDNA =and learned that it won't produce [math]
results more than 15 chars long before it resorts =to
scientific notation, and =therefore it appears your
suggestion is not possible ... =:(
I also did a bunch of reading online about prime =numbers
(very interesting) but =none of it matters for use in WebDNA
if the [math] context cannot produce numbers more than =15
chars =long.
It sure would =be nice if encrypt / decrypt worked with
cookies, and I'm not sure why it doesn't when it works =with
db's. Any theories =about this?
Sincerely,
Ken =Grome
=--Apple-Mail=_65A1862A-9A81-4A9C-8266-8547D60536CB--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Apple-Mail=_65A1862A-9A81-4A9C-8266-8547D60536CBContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/plain;charset=us-asciiAlmost 4 years on and the only encryption/decryption that you can do =with cookies is method=3DBase64, and I have just spent 2 days proving it =:(Thinking of opening a liquor store ..... problem is it may be like =Dracula in charge of the Blood BankOn 28/10/2008, at 1:42 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:> On 28/10/2008, at 1:11 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:>=20>> Hi Matthew,>>=20>> I tested WebDNA and learned that it won't produce
[math]>> results more than 15 chars long before it resorts to>> scientific notation, and therefore it appears your>> suggestion is not possible ... :(>>=20>> I also did a bunch of reading online about prime numbers>> (very interesting) but none of it matters for use in WebDNA>> if the
[math] context cannot produce numbers more than 15>> chars long.>>=20>> It sure would be nice if encrypt / decrypt worked with>> cookies, and I'm not sure why it doesn't when it works with>> db's. Any theories about this?>>=20>> Sincerely,>> Ken Grome--Apple-Mail=_65A1862A-9A81-4A9C-8266-8547D60536CBContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/html;charset=us-asciiAlmost 4 years on and the only encryption/decryption that you can do =with cookies is method=3DBase64, and I have just spent 2 days proving it =:(
Thinking of opening a liquor store ..... problem =is it may be like Dracula in charge of the Blood =Bank
=On 28/10/2008, at 1:42 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote:
On =28/10/2008, at 1:11 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I tested WebDNA =and learned that it won't produce [math]
results more than 15 chars long before it resorts =to
scientific notation, and =therefore it appears your
suggestion is not possible ... =:(
I also did a bunch of reading online about prime =numbers
(very interesting) but =none of it matters for use in WebDNA
if the [math] context cannot produce numbers more than =15
chars =long.
It sure would =be nice if encrypt / decrypt worked with
cookies, and I'm not sure why it doesn't when it works =with
db's. Any theories =about this?
Sincerely,
Ken =Grome
=--Apple-Mail=_65A1862A-9A81-4A9C-8266-8547D60536CB--
Stuart Tremain
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
fyi, my install notes: RH Enterprise + WebDNA 5.1 (2004)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)
Expiration of Carts (1997)
WebCat2final1 crashes (1997)
[delete] problem (1997)
Database Not Found Problem (2004)
Security Question (1997)
search across ip/domain addresses? (1998)
RE: Re:Signal Raised (1997)
Setting up the server (1997)
need help sifting through a few thousand files (2002)
shipcost (1997)
Include a big block of text (1997)
2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997)
WebSTAR/WebCatalog losing files (2000)
NY State Zip Codes & Tax percent (2002)
default value from Lookup (was Grant, please help me) (1997)
[ShowIf] a either fields are blank (1998)
New random discoveries? (2005)
Questions about maximum (1999)