Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64"

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101282
interpreted = N
texte = > I've never had a need to calculate in webdna more than 15 > characters. That's why I asked in the beginning of my > post if it could calculate that high. I noticed your concern when you first posted, but I was already thinking up a way to do this using alphanum chars and db's and such ... which is why this issue didn't raise its ugly head until I decided to try your approach. > However, thinking further out of the hat here, you could > still use the same method, just use a smaller prime > number and instead of starting with a 40 digit number, > break it down into manageable segments, do the > calculations, then concatenate it back together again. This may be the best way to keep it all in webdna. Then again, I really like Bob's suggestion because it would appear to be more elegant than chopping up the original value into little pieces simply to "make it work" within [math]s limitations. > I still feel that a mathematical approach is much faster > than anything anyone can put together with databases or > tables. Me too, that's why I like your concept, we simply have to bypass [math]s limits one way or the other ... Sincerely, Ken Grome Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Brian Fries 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Govinda 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Stuart Tremain 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Gary Krockover" 2008)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Marc Thompson 2008)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Bob Minor 2008)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Brian Fries 2008)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Marc Thompson 2008)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Patrick McCormick 2008)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Brian Fries 2008)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Christer Olsson 2008)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Bob Minor 2008)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  36. RE: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Olin Lagon" 2008)
  37. RE: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Olin Lagon" 2008)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  39. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  40. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  41. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  42. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" ("Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi " 2008)
  43. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  44. Re: [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  45. [WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (Kenneth Grome 2008)
> I've never had a need to calculate in webdna more than 15 > characters. That's why I asked in the beginning of my > post if it could calculate that high. I noticed your concern when you first posted, but I was already thinking up a way to do this using alphanum chars and db's and such ... which is why this issue didn't raise its ugly head until I decided to try your approach. > However, thinking further out of the hat here, you could > still use the same method, just use a smaller prime > number and instead of starting with a 40 digit number, > break it down into manageable segments, do the > calculations, then concatenate it back together again. This may be the best way to keep it all in webdna. Then again, I really like Bob's suggestion because it would appear to be more elegant than chopping up the original value into little pieces simply to "make it work" within [math]s limitations. > I still feel that a mathematical approach is much faster > than anything anyone can put together with databases or > tables. Me too, that's why I like your concept, we simply have to bypass [math]s limits one way or the other ... Sincerely, Ken Grome Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RAM variables (1997) SAVECART (1997) E-mailer error codes (1997) Can't find templaes (1997) Math, Multiple Equasions and Show/Hide (1998) [showif] based on data from [tcpconnect][tcpsend]? (2000) Making webcam movies (2003) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Rollovers (1999) Verbose error reporting (1998) Sitebuilder (2004) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) Redirect (2003) Bookmarked URL with cart (1998) ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) Error Log.db --however (1997) Show if time tags (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) Emailer Set Up (1997)