Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110192
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Kenneth, Not offended in any way, but being a part of and understanding market = economy I need to emphasize that there is always to sides of everything, = in this case a company and a customer. I have the right amount of = respect for Donovan and Christophe for trying to rescue what Smith Micro = put into the grave. I for one have chosen the Mac platform and have = invested a lot of money in the product WebDNA and a huge amount of hours = in developing services - and I cant escape the thought of being left = behind no matter how hard the current team are working (as mentioned = before, with all respect). I accept their decision in a market = perspective but I as a loyal customer is left behind. That's all - no = pun intended... It would help, just a tad, if a well written roadmap where published in = public with focus on platforms and functionality - what I have seen = today has been very scattered. And would (as always) be happy to help in = many ways, but I think additional licenses is on hold until I can = actually see that I get something for the money on the platform of my = choice. Long live WebDNA and may the platform also be attractive for me in the = future... /Palle On 26/02/2013, at 18.45, Kenneth Grome wrote: > No offense to you or any other Mac server users, but when a=20 > company like WSC has "only so much" money to work with it=20 > becomes critically important that they apply those limited=20 > funds where they will generate maximum revenue ASAP. >=20 > After WSC is making money hand over fist on their future=20 > Linux software sales they can easily use some of that excess=20 > cash to splurge on developing software for less popular=20 > server OS's -- such as OSX and Windows for example. Until=20 > then I believe they are doing exactly what they need to do. >=20 > I used to be a die-hard Mac guy, too. Do many/any of you=20 > remember that far back? We're talking the mid/late 1990's! >=20 > :) >=20 > If I were still a dedicated Mac fanatic like I was back=20 > then, I might feel slighted by WSC's decision to put off the=20 > OSX version until later. Nevertheless this is a very wise=20 > business decision for WSC and I applaud them for it. >=20 > WSC's first priority should always be to focus on the=20 > software that sells in their largest potential market. In=20 > this day and age that market runs Linux servers. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> You almost answered my question here... >>=20 >> Seems like we are now second priority. >>=20 >> /Palle >>=20 >> On 26/02/2013, at 17.30, Donovan Brooke=20 > wrote: >>> I should note that WSC will be holding off on a new >>> WebDNA Server build for the latest Mac OS X OS, simply >>> because WebDNA 6.2 still runs fine on it. OS X will >>> still be supported, but a new WebDNA Server build will >>> be down the road a bit. > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Kenneth Grome 2013)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Kenneth Grome 2013)
  5. [WebDNA] Linux Support (Donovan Brooke 2013)
Hi Kenneth, Not offended in any way, but being a part of and understanding market = economy I need to emphasize that there is always to sides of everything, = in this case a company and a customer. I have the right amount of = respect for Donovan and Christophe for trying to rescue what Smith Micro = put into the grave. I for one have chosen the Mac platform and have = invested a lot of money in the product WebDNA and a huge amount of hours = in developing services - and I cant escape the thought of being left = behind no matter how hard the current team are working (as mentioned = before, with all respect). I accept their decision in a market = perspective but I as a loyal customer is left behind. That's all - no = pun intended... It would help, just a tad, if a well written roadmap where published in = public with focus on platforms and functionality - what I have seen = today has been very scattered. And would (as always) be happy to help in = many ways, but I think additional licenses is on hold until I can = actually see that I get something for the money on the platform of my = choice. Long live WebDNA and may the platform also be attractive for me in the = future... /Palle On 26/02/2013, at 18.45, Kenneth Grome wrote: > No offense to you or any other Mac server users, but when a=20 > company like WSC has "only so much" money to work with it=20 > becomes critically important that they apply those limited=20 > funds where they will generate maximum revenue ASAP. >=20 > After WSC is making money hand over fist on their future=20 > Linux software sales they can easily use some of that excess=20 > cash to splurge on developing software for less popular=20 > server OS's -- such as OSX and Windows for example. Until=20 > then I believe they are doing exactly what they need to do. >=20 > I used to be a die-hard Mac guy, too. Do many/any of you=20 > remember that far back? We're talking the mid/late 1990's! >=20 > :) >=20 > If I were still a dedicated Mac fanatic like I was back=20 > then, I might feel slighted by WSC's decision to put off the=20 > OSX version until later. Nevertheless this is a very wise=20 > business decision for WSC and I applaud them for it. >=20 > WSC's first priority should always be to focus on the=20 > software that sells in their largest potential market. In=20 > this day and age that market runs Linux servers. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> You almost answered my question here... >>=20 >> Seems like we are now second priority. >>=20 >> /Palle >>=20 >> On 26/02/2013, at 17.30, Donovan Brooke=20 > wrote: >>> I should note that WSC will be holding off on a new >>> WebDNA Server build for the latest Mac OS X OS, simply >>> because WebDNA 6.2 still runs fine on it. OS X will >>> still be supported, but a new WebDNA Server build will >>> be down the road a bit. > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Palle Bo Nielsen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Calendar using WebCatalog? (1997) Multiple fields on 1 input (1997) I found a bug ... (1997) Giving out error pages (1997) Generating Options for a Form. (1997) Email within tmpl ? (1997) Time/date formatting %X doesn't work ... (1997) Error: Missing c in orderfile???? (2005) Lost Installer (2000) Resume Catalog ? (1997) Re:Emailer setup (1997) Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997) [math] are you there? (1999) Nested vs conditional (1997) All choices on IE different than Netscape (1997) japanese characters (1997) Another issue with [Date format] (1998) Changing price for a SLU based on options (size, etc.) (1997) WebDNA 6 (2004) Emailer setup (1997)