Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112215
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail=_60D550D3-A624-4F80-8666-44116C3B8A32 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Personally I prefer to segment my code, so I=92ll retrieve data and = store it in a variable, then elsewhere do something with the data. This = makes it (to me) easier to read, debug, and reuse code. =20 -BrianB > On Mar 25, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Steve Raslevich = wrote: >=20 > True. Do you think there is a disatvantage the way I've been using = [raw],[/raw] within the [founditems] within [sendmail] ?=20 >=20 > Terry Wilson wrote: >>=20 >> It doesn't cost anything. The founditems loop is just moved up a few = lines. >>=20 >> [text]bccaddresses=3D[founditems][EMAILADDRESS],[/founditems][/text] >>=20 >> [SendMail to=3Dcustomer@abc.com&bcc=3D = [bccaddresses]&from=3Dsupport@xyz&sub= ject=3Dsend to many&Content-Type=3Dtext/html] >>=20 >> Terry >>=20 >> On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Steve Raslevich = = wrote: >>=20 --Apple-Mail=_60D550D3-A624-4F80-8666-44116C3B8A32 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Personally I prefer to segment my code, so I=92ll retrieve = data and store it in a variable, then elsewhere do something with the = data. This makes it (to me) easier to read, debug, and reuse code.
 
-BrianB

On = Mar 25, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Steve Raslevich <webdna@northernsoundandlight.com> wrote:

True. Do you think there is a disatvantage the way I've been using  [raw],[/raw] within the [founditems] within [sendmail] ?

Terry Wilson wrote: 
It doesn't cost anything. The founditems =loop is just moved up a few lines.[text]bccaddresses=3D[founditems][EMAILADDRESS],[/founditems][/text][SendMail to=3Dcustomer@abc.com&=;bcc=3D[bccaddresses]&from=3Dsupport@xyz&subject=3Dsend to =many&Content-Type=3Dtext/html]TerryOn Mar 25, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Steve Raslevich <WebDNA@northernsounda=ndlight.com> wrote:

= --Apple-Mail=_60D550D3-A624-4F80-8666-44116C3B8A32-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Steve Raslevich 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Diane Blackmore 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Terry Wilson 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Brian Burton 2015)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Steve Raslevich 2015)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Terry Wilson 2015)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Steve Raslevich 2015)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Terry Wilson 2015)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Steve Raslevich 2015)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Terry Wilson 2015)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Steve Raslevich 2015)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Steve Raslevich 2015)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Diane Blackmore 2015)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Tom Duke 2015)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Diane Blackmore 2015)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Diane Blackmore 2015)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  24. [WebDNA] Emailer breaking format (Diane Blackmore 2015)
--Apple-Mail=_60D550D3-A624-4F80-8666-44116C3B8A32 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Personally I prefer to segment my code, so I=92ll retrieve data and = store it in a variable, then elsewhere do something with the data. This = makes it (to me) easier to read, debug, and reuse code. =20 -BrianB > On Mar 25, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Steve Raslevich = wrote: >=20 > True. Do you think there is a disatvantage the way I've been using = [raw],[/raw] within the [founditems] within [sendmail] ?=20 >=20 > Terry Wilson wrote: >>=20 >> It doesn't cost anything. The founditems loop is just moved up a few = lines. >>=20 >> [text]bccaddresses=3D[founditems][EMAILADDRESS],[/founditems][/text] >>=20 >> [SendMail to=3Dcustomer@abc.com&bcc=3D = [bccaddresses]&from=3Dsupport@xyz&sub= ject=3Dsend to many&Content-Type=3Dtext/html] >>=20 >> Terry >>=20 >> On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Steve Raslevich = = wrote: >>=20 --Apple-Mail=_60D550D3-A624-4F80-8666-44116C3B8A32 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Personally I prefer to segment my code, so I=92ll retrieve = data and store it in a variable, then elsewhere do something with the = data. This makes it (to me) easier to read, debug, and reuse code.
 
-BrianB

On = Mar 25, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Steve Raslevich <webdna@northernsoundandlight.com> wrote:

True. Do you think there is a disatvantage the way I've been using  [raw],[/raw] within the [founditems] within [sendmail] ?

Terry Wilson wrote: 
It doesn't cost anything. The founditems =loop is just moved up a few lines.[text]bccaddresses=3D[founditems][EMAILADDRESS],[/founditems][/text][SendMail to=3Dcustomer@abc.com&=;bcc=3D[bccaddresses]&from=3Dsupport@xyz&subject=3Dsend to =many&Content-Type=3Dtext/html]TerryOn Mar 25, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Steve Raslevich <WebDNA@northernsounda=ndlight.com> wrote:

= --Apple-Mail=_60D550D3-A624-4F80-8666-44116C3B8A32-- Brian Burton

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

appending to my last post (1999) WebCat editing, SiteGuard WAS:SiteAssociative lookup style? (1997) PIXO support (1997) Setting up shop (1997) SSL with IIS 4.0 (1998) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) blank fields (1999) Authorize.net has gone flooey (2006) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Cookie and Domain Names (2005) [OT] Am I an Idiot? (2004) Database Program (1997) Database Locking?!? (2000) encryption madness (2003) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) [protect admin] (1997) html delivery (1997) multiple search commands (1997) [OT] DOD again (2003)