Re: WebCat with WebTen

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18242
interpreted = N
texte = >>Would switching to the ACGI prevent the two from >>apparently stomping on each other's memory? Any performance issues on the >>ACGI vs. the plug-in? > >We have heard over on the WebTen list that plugins are sometimes getting >their memory stomped by the server. I think your idea is a good one -- >even though there is a performance hit using the CGI because now >AppleEvents are involved for each template hit, but plenty of people have >good performance anyway. The CGI should be able to get at templates just >fine; there are plenty of people using it with WebTen.Or just give WebTen more memory. No problems any more after that. There was a discussion on this issue some time ago on the WebTen mailinglist.John ter.welle@lettrix.nl---------------------------------------------------------- -Internet is our business and webcommerce our specialty- Lettrix Grafische Automatisering http://www.lettrix.nl Willem Speelmanhof 27, 3762 JN Soest The Netherlands Phone: +31 35 6036262, Fax: +31 35 6036266 E-mail: ter.welle@lettrix.nl ---------------------------------------------------------- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebCat with WebTen (ter.welle@lettrix.nl (SJ ter Welle) 1998)
  2. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Britt T. 1998)
  3. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  4. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Britt T. 1998)
  5. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  6. Re: WebCat with WebTen (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  7. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Peter Ostry 1998)
  8. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  9. WebCat with WebTen (Rob Marquardt 1998)
>>Would switching to the ACGI prevent the two from >>apparently stomping on each other's memory? Any performance issues on the >>ACGI vs. the plug-in? > >We have heard over on the WebTen list that plugins are sometimes getting >their memory stomped by the server. I think your idea is a good one -- >even though there is a performance hit using the CGI because now >AppleEvents are involved for each template hit, but plenty of people have >good performance anyway. The CGI should be able to get at templates just >fine; there are plenty of people using it with WebTen.Or just give WebTen more memory. No problems any more after that. There was a discussion on this issue some time ago on the WebTen mailinglist.John ter.welle@lettrix.nl---------------------------------------------------------- -Internet is our business and webcommerce our specialty- Lettrix Grafische Automatisering http://www.lettrix.nl Willem Speelmanhof 27, 3762 JN Soest The Netherlands Phone: +31 35 6036262, Fax: +31 35 6036266 E-mail: ter.welle@lettrix.nl ---------------------------------------------------------- ter.welle@lettrix.nl (SJ ter Welle)

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

OT: Amazon Patents (2000) [Mac 3.0.8] Formulas.db Question (2003) Multiple Unique SKUs (2000) Page-Execution-Timer...PHP vs WebDNA (2004) Setting up WebCatalog with Retail Pro data (1996) Protecting a folder (2000) writefile on OSX (2004) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Multipart Form - Ascertain File Type (2007) Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997) Wanted: More Math Functions (or, Can You Solve This?) (1997) Sending emails (went[ot] ) (2002) RequiredFields template (1997) [WebDNA] JSON parsing (2010) A Suggestion? (1998) Caching problem... (2000) Emailer Set Up (1997) Logical and or in [hideif] (1997) New Command prefs ... (1997) WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)