Re: WebCat with WebTen

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18242
interpreted = N
texte = >>Would switching to the ACGI prevent the two from >>apparently stomping on each other's memory? Any performance issues on the >>ACGI vs. the plug-in? > >We have heard over on the WebTen list that plugins are sometimes getting >their memory stomped by the server. I think your idea is a good one -- >even though there is a performance hit using the CGI because now >AppleEvents are involved for each template hit, but plenty of people have >good performance anyway. The CGI should be able to get at templates just >fine; there are plenty of people using it with WebTen.Or just give WebTen more memory. No problems any more after that. There was a discussion on this issue some time ago on the WebTen mailinglist.John ter.welle@lettrix.nl---------------------------------------------------------- -Internet is our business and webcommerce our specialty- Lettrix Grafische Automatisering http://www.lettrix.nl Willem Speelmanhof 27, 3762 JN Soest The Netherlands Phone: +31 35 6036262, Fax: +31 35 6036266 E-mail: ter.welle@lettrix.nl ---------------------------------------------------------- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebCat with WebTen (ter.welle@lettrix.nl (SJ ter Welle) 1998)
  2. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Britt T. 1998)
  3. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  4. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Britt T. 1998)
  5. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  6. Re: WebCat with WebTen (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  7. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Peter Ostry 1998)
  8. Re: WebCat with WebTen (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  9. WebCat with WebTen (Rob Marquardt 1998)
>>Would switching to the ACGI prevent the two from >>apparently stomping on each other's memory? Any performance issues on the >>ACGI vs. the plug-in? > >We have heard over on the WebTen list that plugins are sometimes getting >their memory stomped by the server. I think your idea is a good one -- >even though there is a performance hit using the CGI because now >AppleEvents are involved for each template hit, but plenty of people have >good performance anyway. The CGI should be able to get at templates just >fine; there are plenty of people using it with WebTen.Or just give WebTen more memory. No problems any more after that. There was a discussion on this issue some time ago on the WebTen mailinglist.John ter.welle@lettrix.nl---------------------------------------------------------- -Internet is our business and webcommerce our specialty- Lettrix Grafische Automatisering http://www.lettrix.nl Willem Speelmanhof 27, 3762 JN Soest The Netherlands Phone: +31 35 6036262, Fax: +31 35 6036266 E-mail: ter.welle@lettrix.nl ---------------------------------------------------------- ter.welle@lettrix.nl (SJ ter Welle)

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Euro WebDNA Conference (2004) Simple way to create unique SKU (1997) loops (2000) WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997) PCS Frames (1997) webcat2b12 CGI -- Date comparisons (1997) Post arguments problem mac? (1997) Emailed problem (2000) IE 6 weirdness ??? (2002) Templates on Unix & CGI on Mac? (1997) syntax question, not in online refernce (1997) Harvesting invalid email addresses from bounced emails??? (2000) SiteGuard Admin Feature ? (1997) absolute paths for databases? (1997) Help with (2003) oops private message leaked into talk list (1997) reverse of math value... (2004) Tab Charactor (1997) Major NT problem Interruption of service (1998) Indexing Web sites? (2000)