Re: Size images

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41987
interpreted = N
texte = Last time I looked, fileinfo did not give accurate height and width on progressive jpgs and interlaced gifs, or so I think I remember. Has this been fixed? Otherwise, using something other than WebDNA to get the values seems like an awfully good idea. Velma >le 27/07/02 20:06, Jesse Williams-Proudman à j.list@ninewire.com a écrit : > > > On 7/27/02 4:20 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: > > > >> I would just let webcat pull the data via the imageheight and > >> imagewidth tags -- especially if the images are .gif files which > >> apparently don't take as long to get these values as jpg's do .. > > > > Or you could use [shell] and ImageMagik to grab the values as it will give > > you a definite size on pretty much every image type. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  2. Re: Size images (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  3. Re: Size images (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  4. Re: Size images (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  5. Re: Size images (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  6. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  7. Re: Size images (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  8. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  9. Re: Size images (Velma Kahn 2002)
  10. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  11. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  12. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  13. Re: Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
  14. Re: Size images (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  15. Re: Size images (Blade 2002)
  16. Re: Size images (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  17. Re: Size images (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  18. Re: Size images (Alain Russell 2002)
  19. Size images (lb Lawrence 2002)
Last time I looked, fileinfo did not give accurate height and width on progressive jpgs and interlaced gifs, or so I think I remember. Has this been fixed? Otherwise, using something other than WebDNA to get the values seems like an awfully good idea. Velma >le 27/07/02 20:06, Jesse Williams-Proudman à j.list@ninewire.com a écrit : > > > On 7/27/02 4:20 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: > > > >> I would just let webcat pull the data via the imageheight and > >> imagewidth tags -- especially if the images are .gif files which > >> apparently don't take as long to get these values as jpg's do .. > > > > Or you could use [shell] and ImageMagik to grab the values as it will give > > you a definite size on pretty much every image type. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Velma Kahn

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Virtual Postcards (1998) Bug? (1997) Forms Search Questions (1997) Re2: frames & carts (1997) Listfiles context (2000) Graphical display of sales volume (2003) headers in webcat 4.0. (2000) Email within tmpl ? (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) UNSUBSCRIBE (2000) Grant, please help me ... (1997) Interesting speed comparison .. (2003) Entry pages (was: WebCatalog MAJOR drawback) (1998) XMLNodes Error (2007) Mass deletion of records (2006) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) text conversions (1999) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) WebCat2 beta FTP site (1997) Buying sans cart (1997)