Re: [OT] DOD

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45012
interpreted = N
texte = Dan, you sound paranoid... You're not secretly running some kind of prostitution ring behind your company are you???? I've heard of this in these circles......Dan Strong wrote:> FunnelWeb Analyzer is showing from my logs that the US Department of Defense has been browsing my > (and some of my clients') site(s). Is this accurate? A glitch in FunnelWeb? > > I mean, if it's true, I suppose DOD employees like to surf the web too, but it just seems > weird...maybe a new anti-cyberterrorist initiative? And if so, why me and my clients? Are any of > you seeing this activity in your logs? > > TIA, maybe this is a non-topic, but it just strikes me as odd, that's all and I'd like to find > an/the answer for when my clients start asking. > > -Dan > ------------------------------------------- > http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com > (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Alex McCombie 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Dan Strong 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  6. Re: [OT] DOD again (SREGALADO@aol.com 2003)
  7. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  8. Re: [OT] DOD again (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  9. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  11. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  12. Re: [OT] DOD again (Gyuri 2003)
  13. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  14. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  15. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  16. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  17. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  18. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  19. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  20. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  21. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  22. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  23. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  24. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  25. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  26. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  27. [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  28. Re: [OT] DOD (Frank Nordberg 2002)
  29. Re: [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
  30. Re: [OT] DOD (dale's stuff 2002)
  31. Re: [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
  32. Re: [OT] DOD (Robert Wade 2002)
  33. Re: [OT] DOD (Gary Krockover 2002)
  34. [OT] DOD (Dan Strong 2002)
Dan, you sound paranoid... You're not secretly running some kind of prostitution ring behind your company are you???? I've heard of this in these circles......Dan Strong wrote:> FunnelWeb Analyzer is showing from my logs that the US Department of Defense has been browsing my > (and some of my clients') site(s). Is this accurate? A glitch in FunnelWeb? > > I mean, if it's true, I suppose DOD employees like to surf the web too, but it just seems > weird...maybe a new anti-cyberterrorist initiative? And if so, why me and my clients? Are any of > you seeing this activity in your logs? > > TIA, maybe this is a non-topic, but it just strikes me as odd, that's all and I'd like to find > an/the answer for when my clients start asking. > > -Dan > ------------------------------------------- > http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com > (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Robert Wade

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Running webcat 6 on Windows XP Prof. (2005) carriage returns in data (1997) corrupted images (2002) Upgrade to 4.0 (2001) Emailer (1997) Line items in table cells (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) searching by date range help needed (1997) [Shownext] [whynot] (2000) [shell] (2002) anyone using Webcat 4.x in production? (2000) weight based shipping cost questions (1997) Bug? (1997) form variables (2000) Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search) (2006) includes and cart numbers (1997) Deleting associated records from 2 different databases (2001) One more browser problem to watch out for... (1997) Browser Check for WebDNA compatability (1999) Couple of techno questions (1999)