Re: [WebDNA] Permission Settings

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102747
interpreted = N
texte = > Not really Ken, it uses them, as you noted in your > original post. It uses them in writefile but it does NOT use them in copyfile and movefile. I guess one out of three ain't bad ... :) > Perhaps aspects do not work in how you assume. I made the same logical assumption any programmer would make -- that WebDNA would NOT muck with my file permissions unless I asked it to. Clearly this was a bad assumption in the case of copyfile and movefile. Since this behavior has never been documented until now I'm betting that other WebDNA users will want to know about this behavior too. I posted it here not to complain about it, but to see if you had any clues as to why this was happening -- and more importantly so we could "figure it out" if you didn't know why, and so I could begin to reliably predict WebDNA's behavior again. > I believe Ubuntu has multiple .profile files... > which may affect your umask setting. It does, and I have them all set correctly, but changing umask settings will not fix the problem. The fact remains that WebDNA fails to retain the original file permissions when it copies or moves a file. As long as we know about this we can deal with it. So now that I've documented it here on the talk list we all know what to expect, and I'm done discussing it. Have a nice day! :) Sincerely, Ken Grome Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Permission Settings (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Permission Settings (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Permission Settings (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Permission Settings (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  5. [WebDNA] Permission Settings (Kenneth Grome 2009)
> Not really Ken, it uses them, as you noted in your > original post. It uses them in writefile but it does NOT use them in copyfile and movefile. I guess one out of three ain't bad ... :) > Perhaps aspects do not work in how you assume. I made the same logical assumption any programmer would make -- that WebDNA would NOT muck with my file permissions unless I asked it to. Clearly this was a bad assumption in the case of copyfile and movefile. Since this behavior has never been documented until now I'm betting that other WebDNA users will want to know about this behavior too. I posted it here not to complain about it, but to see if you had any clues as to why this was happening -- and more importantly so we could "figure it out" if you didn't know why, and so I could begin to reliably predict WebDNA's behavior again. > I believe Ubuntu has multiple .profile files... > which may affect your umask setting. It does, and I have them all set correctly, but changing umask settings will not fix the problem. The fact remains that WebDNA fails to retain the original file permissions when it copies or moves a file. As long as we know about this we can deal with it. So now that I've documented it here on the Talk List we all know what to expect, and I'm done discussing it. Have a nice day! :) Sincerely, Ken Grome Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:Remote stockroom ? (1998) [searchString] (1997) [WebDNA] Ubuntu 14.04 & WebDNA (2017) "&" character in Flash animation (2004) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) WebMerchant 3.0 for Mac shipping now (1998) MacAuthorize order data fields WAS:How To question... (1997) Spaces inside [AppendFile] (1998) problems with 2 tags (1997) Mass Mail (2000) [OT] Colored source code in IE? (2007) New index for docs (1997) Nav. 4 probs with cart (1997) Transfer of data from Invoice to thank you templates (1998) Sort Order on a page search (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Hard Questions ? (1997) RE: ANother SHOWIF problem (1997) f2 download problems (1997) File upload woes (1998)