Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103114
interpreted = N
texte = OK Guys Here is my forum http://forums.sydneyflyfishing.com.au/ It has been running for many years now without any problems. demo site: http://forums.graphiteforums.com/ GraphiteFORUMS GraphiteFORUMS is a fully threaded Bulletin Board system developed for =20= clients wanting the ultimate in Bulletin Board messaging. Features =95 Advanced site search, allowing to search all or particular forums, =20= and displaying the results as threads and/or replies =95 Members list showing posts and last communications =95 Member registration and activation through email authentication =95 Member profiles include 'signature' and picture, members can elect =20= to show or hide their details =95 Posts by members only =95 Upload photos in posts =95 Create posts with styling =95 View profile of message author =95 Emoticons =95 Members can subscribe to threads =95 Members can edit their own posts Administrator Controls =95 Add/edit/delete forums =95 Filter/censor words =95 Control members - suspend/delete & restrict membership to a given =20= email list =95 Assign moderators =95 Turn emoticons on/off =95 Turn images on/off I am willing to provide the code at no charge provided that it becomes =20= an Open Source project for the WebDNA community. I think that could be =20= a great first step in creating Open Source projects and community =20 cooperation. I would like the project to be managed under the WebDNA.us banner. Check it out, ask me questions. Donovan, are you able to accommodate the project ? Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 04/08/2009, at 1:19 AM, Patrick McCormick wrote: > I'm curious to know how many of you have built a discussion forum. > > I'm trying to get a picture of the amount of effort we may all be =20 > duplicating and I'm looking for ideas to allow us all to work more =20 > efficiently. > > If we were all contributing to an open-source discussion forum, it =20 > would certainly save us all time and produce a better final result. =20= > It would also be great wor WebDNA because it would allow us to =20 > compete better with PHP. New users would be able to get a forum site =20= > up and running in WebDNA just like they can with PHP. > > In fact, if we were to produce ours to take advantage of things like =20= > jQuery's ThemeRoller, we would have some distinct advantages over =20 > PHP versions because some of that code is fairly old. > > The problem is that some programmers have put years of work into =20 > their forums. It would be asking a lot to simply hand that work over. > > Can we start a new discussion forum from scratch, using SubVersion =20 > control, which all programmers can contribute to? > > Can we find a way to fairly compensate whoever has some good =20 > starting code to get us down the road further? > > How important is a discussion forum to each of you? > > Pat Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  3. RE: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum ("Michael A. DeLorenzo" 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Dean Smith 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Dean Smith 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Dale Lists 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Alex McCombie 2009)
  15. RE: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum ("Michael A. DeLorenzo" 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Michael Palacio 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Govinda 2009)
  21. [WebDNA] Poll: Discussion Forum (Patrick McCormick 2009)
OK Guys Here is my forum http://forums.sydneyflyfishing.com.au/ It has been running for many years now without any problems. demo site: http://forums.graphiteforums.com/ GraphiteFORUMS GraphiteFORUMS is a fully threaded Bulletin Board system developed for =20= clients wanting the ultimate in Bulletin Board messaging. Features =95 Advanced site search, allowing to search all or particular forums, =20= and displaying the results as threads and/or replies =95 Members list showing posts and last communications =95 Member registration and activation through email authentication =95 Member profiles include 'signature' and picture, members can elect =20= to show or hide their details =95 Posts by members only =95 Upload photos in posts =95 Create posts with styling =95 View profile of message author =95 Emoticons =95 Members can subscribe to threads =95 Members can edit their own posts Administrator Controls =95 Add/edit/delete forums =95 Filter/censor words =95 Control members - suspend/delete & restrict membership to a given =20= email list =95 Assign moderators =95 Turn emoticons on/off =95 Turn images on/off I am willing to provide the code at no charge provided that it becomes =20= an Open Source project for the WebDNA community. I think that could be =20= a great first step in creating Open Source projects and community =20 cooperation. I would like the project to be managed under the WebDNA.us banner. Check it out, ask me questions. Donovan, are you able to accommodate the project ? Regards Stuart Tremain IDFK Web Developments AUSTRALIA webdna@idfk.com.au On 04/08/2009, at 1:19 AM, Patrick McCormick wrote: > I'm curious to know how many of you have built a discussion forum. > > I'm trying to get a picture of the amount of effort we may all be =20 > duplicating and I'm looking for ideas to allow us all to work more =20 > efficiently. > > If we were all contributing to an open-source discussion forum, it =20 > would certainly save us all time and produce a better final result. =20= > It would also be great wor WebDNA because it would allow us to =20 > compete better with PHP. New users would be able to get a forum site =20= > up and running in WebDNA just like they can with PHP. > > In fact, if we were to produce ours to take advantage of things like =20= > jQuery's ThemeRoller, we would have some distinct advantages over =20 > PHP versions because some of that code is fairly old. > > The problem is that some programmers have put years of work into =20 > their forums. It would be asking a lot to simply hand that work over. > > Can we start a new discussion forum from scratch, using SubVersion =20 > control, which all programmers can contribute to? > > Can we find a way to fairly compensate whoever has some good =20 > starting code to get us down the road further? > > How important is a discussion forum to each of you? > > Pat Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Which linux distros for webdna? (2008) Database Security (1998) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Installation Woes (2003) carriage returns in data (1997) 4.5.1 on Panther? (2004) Running more than one WebCatalog serial# (1998) [OT] HTML Table Cell Problem (2003) Re:trouble (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) UPPERCASE (1997) Listfiles & writefile (2001) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) Flash Applications (2003) SiteBuilder? - SlideShow (2004) Rollovers (1999) Dynamic Pop up menu? (1997) Authorize.net, SIM, tcpconnect and applescript (2003) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) Not really WebCat (1997)