Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-)

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104814
interpreted = N
texte = Provide me with these accurate comparisons and I'll do a 2nd "corrected" vid. Note: the original vid cannot be "replaced:" on youtube. -Dan Strong http://www.DanStrong.com On 2/19/2010 12:10 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Paul Willis wrote: >> At the risk of being chased off the list some commentators do have a >> point. >> >> A lot of the PHP example code is padded out unnecessarily. Why are >> the tags included on separate lines, why isn't there a >> similar at the top of each example? Not to >> mention that many setups work with short PHP tags >> >> You don't have to set a variable and then echo it, you can just print >> it straight out etc., for instance... >> >> > $browser = $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']; >> print "$browser"; >> ?> >> >> could be... >> >> >> >> There are also various (unnecessary) lines of error checking code >> included in the PHP samples. >> >> The thing is WebNDA is simpler to code than PHP we don't have to >> 'cheat' to prove it. >> >> is still longer and messier >> than [browsername] >> >> Paul > > > I agree 100% Paul (though I love the general presentation of Dan's > vid!). Comparisons have to be accurate else you lose "clout". Many of > the examples being put out there, including many of them on webdna.us, > could be presented much more accurately and WebDNA will still "win" > the majority of them. You are right. > > Donovan > > > > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Paul Willis 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Paul Willis 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Bob Minor 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Paul Willis 2010)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  23. [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
Provide me with these accurate comparisons and I'll do a 2nd "corrected" vid. Note: the original vid cannot be "replaced:" on youtube. -Dan Strong http://www.DanStrong.com On 2/19/2010 12:10 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Paul Willis wrote: >> At the risk of being chased off the list some commentators do have a >> point. >> >> A lot of the PHP example code is padded out unnecessarily. Why are >> the tags included on separate lines, why isn't there a >> similar at the top of each example? Not to >> mention that many setups work with short PHP tags >> >> You don't have to set a variable and then echo it, you can just print >> it straight out etc., for instance... >> >> > $browser = $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']; >> print "$browser"; >> ?> >> >> could be... >> >> >> >> There are also various (unnecessary) lines of error checking code >> included in the PHP samples. >> >> The thing is WebNDA is simpler to code than PHP we don't have to >> 'cheat' to prove it. >> >> is still longer and messier >> than [browsername] >> >> Paul > > > I agree 100% Paul (though I love the general presentation of Dan's > vid!). Comparisons have to be accurate else you lose "clout". Many of > the examples being put out there, including many of them on webdna.us, > could be presented much more accurately and WebDNA will still "win" > the majority of them. You are right. > > Donovan > > > > Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Add Unit Ship Cost to Cart (2000) [cart] not being interpreted inside [founditems] (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) All choices on IE different than Netscape (1997) RAM variables (1997) absolute paths for databases? (1997) Quit revisited (1997) can WC render sites out? (1997) Printing a final order (1997) how to check for no value while using [URL] to prevent cr (1999) Price problem (1997) [WebDNA] How to Grab link (2014) Searching Multiple DBs (1997) Security Question (1997) [Sum] function? (1997) WebCat for mass emailings (1997) Bug alert! (1997) # of real domains on 1 web server (1997) Proper file locations (1997) Wanted: More Math Functions (or, Can You Solve This?) (1997)