Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-)

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104816
interpreted = N
texte = Is that 100% accurate (trying to head off the nitpickers...), i.e. is it valid without " How about I start with one that I wrote a function to emulate WebDNA's > capabilities... > > $location="index.php; > header('location: > http://'.$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'].dirname($_SERVER['PHP_SELF']).'/'.$location); > > (Note: Can not be used after any other headers are written) > > versus > > [text show=f]location=index.dna[/text] > [redirect [location]] > (Note: Can be anywhere on the page) > > > Dan Strong wrote: >> Provide me with these accurate comparisons and I'll do a 2nd >> "corrected" vid. Note: the original vid cannot be "replaced:" on >> youtube. >> >> -Dan Strong >> http://www.DanStrong.com >> >> >> On 2/19/2010 12:10 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>> Paul Willis wrote: >>>> At the risk of being chased off the list some commentators do have >>>> a point. >>>> >>>> A lot of the PHP example code is padded out unnecessarily. Why are >>>> the tags included on separate lines, why isn't there a >>>> similar at the top of each example? Not to >>>> mention that many setups work with short PHP tags >>>> >>>> You don't have to set a variable and then echo it, you can just >>>> print it straight out etc., for instance... >>>> >>>> >>> $browser = $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']; >>>> print "$browser"; >>>> ?> >>>> >>>> could be... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There are also various (unnecessary) lines of error checking code >>>> included in the PHP samples. >>>> >>>> The thing is WebNDA is simpler to code than PHP we don't have to >>>> 'cheat' to prove it. >>>> >>>> is still longer and >>>> messier than [browsername] >>>> >>>> Paul >>> >>> >>> I agree 100% Paul (though I love the general presentation of Dan's >>> vid!). Comparisons have to be accurate else you lose "clout". Many >>> of the examples being put out there, including many of them on >>> webdna.us, could be presented much more accurately and WebDNA will >>> still "win" the majority of them. You are right. >>> >>> Donovan >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: >> http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=288 >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: > http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=288 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Paul Willis 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Paul Willis 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Bob Minor 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Matthew Bohne 2010)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Paul Willis 2010)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  23. [WebDNA] WebDNA vs. php war ;-) (Dan Strong 2010)
Is that 100% accurate (trying to head off the nitpickers...), i.e. is it valid without " How about I start with one that I wrote a function to emulate WebDNA's > capabilities... > > $location="index.php; > header('location: > http://'.$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'].dirname($_SERVER['PHP_SELF']).'/'.$location); > > (Note: Can not be used after any other headers are written) > > versus > > [text show=f]location=index.dna[/text] > [redirect [location]] > (Note: Can be anywhere on the page) > > > Dan Strong wrote: >> Provide me with these accurate comparisons and I'll do a 2nd >> "corrected" vid. Note: the original vid cannot be "replaced:" on >> youtube. >> >> -Dan Strong >> http://www.DanStrong.com >> >> >> On 2/19/2010 12:10 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>> Paul Willis wrote: >>>> At the risk of being chased off the list some commentators do have >>>> a point. >>>> >>>> A lot of the PHP example code is padded out unnecessarily. Why are >>>> the tags included on separate lines, why isn't there a >>>> similar at the top of each example? Not to >>>> mention that many setups work with short PHP tags >>>> >>>> You don't have to set a variable and then echo it, you can just >>>> print it straight out etc., for instance... >>>> >>>> >>> $browser = $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']; >>>> print "$browser"; >>>> ?> >>>> >>>> could be... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There are also various (unnecessary) lines of error checking code >>>> included in the PHP samples. >>>> >>>> The thing is WebNDA is simpler to code than PHP we don't have to >>>> 'cheat' to prove it. >>>> >>>> is still longer and >>>> messier than [browsername] >>>> >>>> Paul >>> >>> >>> I agree 100% Paul (though I love the general presentation of Dan's >>> vid!). Comparisons have to be accurate else you lose "clout". Many >>> of the examples being put out there, including many of them on >>> webdna.us, could be presented much more accurately and WebDNA will >>> still "win" the majority of them. You are right. >>> >>> Donovan >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: >> http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=288 >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: > http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=288 Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Problems with Price field (1997) Payment Calculator? (2000) New Webcatalog for Mac (1997) [WebDNA] Help with work-around format date: SOLVED (2013) protect tag on NT IIS (1997) IE Cache Problems... (1999) [WebDNA] [OT] File structure for purchased downloads (2010) Re:Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) GuestBook example (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Browser Problem?!? Still getting Error message usingPOST! (1997) Close-to Comparison Code (1998) [WebDNA] [OT] Free Windows FTP client recommendations (2009) authenticate (1999) Nesting format tags (1997) WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) Allow/Deny with Webcat? (1998) Webcatalog/NT dbserver crashing. (2000) Hello world ... (2002)