Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105632
interpreted = N
texte = Have a look there: http://test3.webdna.us/test9.dna This is WebDNA.fcgi 7.0 with the less expensive VPS (Level1 ) from = HostGator http://www.hostgator.com/vps-hosting/ CPU is 560MHz, 384MB RAM - chris On Jul 19, 2010, at 14:39, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> Chris, one question: Why do you think your tests=20 >>> of v7.0 FastCGI with your 'accelerator' are only 1/2=20 >>> to 1/3 as fast as my tests using v6.2? >>=20 >> Most probably because i use a 2.4GHz iMac, which is=20 >> not a very fast machine. Anyway, using the regular=20 >> "webdna_speed" file, i get 182, which is among the=20 >> fastest. I guess you are using an even faster box. >=20 > I have a dual processor Toshiba laptop but it was nearly a = bottom-of-the-line machine when I bought a little more than a year ago = for $429, so I don't really think it's that fast but maybe it's faster = than your iMac. >=20 > I was thinking that perhaps the main reason for the speed difference = is because v6.2 code is faster than v7.x FastCGI code. Do you think = this has anything to do with it? I guess we won't really know until = someone tests both versions on the same box ... >=20 > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  14. [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
Have a look there: http://test3.webdna.us/test9.dna This is WebDNA.fcgi 7.0 with the less expensive VPS (Level1 ) from = HostGator http://www.hostgator.com/vps-hosting/ CPU is 560MHz, 384MB RAM - chris On Jul 19, 2010, at 14:39, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> Chris, one question: Why do you think your tests=20 >>> of v7.0 FastCGI with your 'accelerator' are only 1/2=20 >>> to 1/3 as fast as my tests using v6.2? >>=20 >> Most probably because i use a 2.4GHz iMac, which is=20 >> not a very fast machine. Anyway, using the regular=20 >> "webdna_speed" file, i get 182, which is among the=20 >> fastest. I guess you are using an even faster box. >=20 > I have a dual processor Toshiba laptop but it was nearly a = bottom-of-the-line machine when I bought a little more than a year ago = for $429, so I don't really think it's that fast but maybe it's faster = than your iMac. >=20 > I was thinking that perhaps the main reason for the speed difference = is because v6.2 code is faster than v7.x FastCGI code. Do you think = this has anything to do with it? I guess we won't really know until = someone tests both versions on the same box ... >=20 > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997) webcat NT (1998) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) Three new problems, maybe a fourth (1997) SetHeader (1999) RE: Web*SSL and WebCatalog (1997) URGENT! Locked DB's (2001) Truncated value after space - refresh my memory.... (1997) Losing file paths? (1999) Force a search at the default.tmpl page? (1997) search problem (2002) Emailer port change (1997) Any way to retrieve information from clipboard? (1999) a * question (2003) [addlineitems] as oppossed to url command=add (2000) Authenticate (1997) [referrer] tag (1997) Summary search -- speed (1997) EmailProblem vs EmailComplete (2000)