Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105632
interpreted = N
texte = Have a look there:http://test3.webdna.us/test9.dnaThis is WebDNA.fcgi 7.0 with the less expensive VPS (Level1 ) from =HostGator http://www.hostgator.com/vps-hosting/CPU is 560MHz, 384MB RAM- chrisOn Jul 19, 2010, at 14:39, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>> Chris, one question: Why do you think your tests=20>>> of v7.0 FastCGI with your 'accelerator' are only 1/2=20>>> to 1/3 as fast as my tests using v6.2?>>=20>> Most probably because i use a 2.4GHz iMac, which is=20>> not a very fast machine. Anyway, using the regular=20>> "webdna_speed" file, i get 182, which is among the=20>> fastest. I guess you are using an even faster box.>=20> I have a dual processor Toshiba laptop but it was nearly a =bottom-of-the-line machine when I bought a little more than a year ago =for $429, so I don't really think it's that fast but maybe it's faster =than your iMac.>=20> I was thinking that perhaps the main reason for the speed difference =is because v6.2 code is faster than v7.x FastCGI code. Do you think =this has anything to do with it? I guess we won't really know until =someone tests both versions on the same box ...>=20> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list
.> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Have a look there:http://test3.webdna.us/test9.dnaThis is WebDNA.fcgi 7.0 with the less expensive VPS (Level1 ) from =HostGator http://www.hostgator.com/vps-hosting/CPU is 560MHz, 384MB RAM- chrisOn Jul 19, 2010, at 14:39, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>> Chris, one question: Why do you think your tests=20>>> of v7.0 FastCGI with your 'accelerator' are only 1/2=20>>> to 1/3 as fast as my tests using v6.2?>>=20>> Most probably because i use a 2.4GHz iMac, which is=20>> not a very fast machine. Anyway, using the regular=20>> "webdna_speed" file, i get 182, which is among the=20>> fastest. I guess you are using an even faster box.>=20> I have a dual processor Toshiba laptop but it was nearly a =bottom-of-the-line machine when I bought a little more than a year ago =for $429, so I don't really think it's that fast but maybe it's faster =than your iMac.>=20> I was thinking that perhaps the main reason for the speed difference =is because v6.2 code is faster than v7.x FastCGI code. Do you think =this has anything to do with it? I guess we won't really know until =someone tests both versions on the same box ...>=20> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997)
webcat NT (1998)
WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
Three new problems, maybe a fourth (1997)
SetHeader (1999)
RE: Web*SSL and WebCatalog (1997)
URGENT! Locked DB's (2001)
Truncated value after space - refresh my memory.... (1997)
Losing file paths? (1999)
Force a search at the default.tmpl page? (1997)
search problem (2002)
Emailer port change (1997)
Any way to retrieve information from clipboard? (1999)
a * question (2003)
[addlineitems] as oppossed to url command=add (2000)
Authenticate (1997)
[referrer] tag (1997)
Summary search -- speed (1997)
EmailProblem vs EmailComplete (2000)