Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105614
interpreted = N
texte = Did you check if the [replace] tag actually writes to disk? or does the =replacement in RAM?We are working on the [append] tag that writes to disk, while it should =not. Maybe the [replace] tag also writes to disk? this wrong behaviour =is intentionally programmed and inherited from previous versions.- chrisOn Jul 18, 2010, at 18:46, Kenneth Grome wrote:> I may have been wrong about replace in a loop not working properly. =Instead it may just be REALLY SLOW ...>=20> I just ran a new test and learned that it takes 10+ seconds to replace =those 45 db records. I never imagined that it would take so long to do =such a few replaces but apparently it does. =20>=20> This means I cannot look only at the "5 seconds in time" that I posted =previously. Instead I have to look at 2-3 times as many records in =order to see all 45 that were replaced.>=20> So right now here's what I think:>=20> WebDNA may actually be replacing all 45 records, but it is taking way =too long to do it, so I still have to find another alternative to my =existing code.>=20> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list
.> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Did you check if the [replace] tag actually writes to disk? or does the =replacement in RAM?We are working on the [append] tag that writes to disk, while it should =not. Maybe the [replace] tag also writes to disk? this wrong behaviour =is intentionally programmed and inherited from previous versions.- chrisOn Jul 18, 2010, at 18:46, Kenneth Grome wrote:> I may have been wrong about replace in a loop not working properly. =Instead it may just be REALLY SLOW ...>=20> I just ran a new test and learned that it takes 10+ seconds to replace =those 45 db records. I never imagined that it would take so long to do =such a few replaces but apparently it does. =20>=20> This means I cannot look only at the "5 seconds in time" that I posted =previously. Instead I have to look at 2-3 times as many records in =order to see all 45 that were replaced.>=20> So right now here's what I think:>=20> WebDNA may actually be replacing all 45 records, but it is taking way =too long to do it, so I still have to find another alternative to my =existing code.>=20> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[WebDNA] writing pdfs on the fly (Avery labels #5160) (2010)
[append] and SSL (1997)
WebTV, IPAddress, Cookies, IDEAS?? (1998)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)
update on wn searching (1997)
[shownext] and descending order (1997)
Showif, Search and text ? (2003)
questions on variations of Ken's [text multi=T]var1=&var2=[/text] (1999)
WebMerchant and AVS (1998)
Jimmy (1998)
List archive status? (1999)
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
Multiply prices (1997)
multiple databases (1997)
Emailer help....! (1997)
Firewalls - What's Good? (1999)
Where's Cart Created ? (1997)
Need help!! on searching in two databases. (1998)
NetSplat and WebCat2 (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)