Re: [WebDNA] No more SQL in 7.1?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108467
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail=_40E6542D-0F41-4FC1-9AD8-05E0D59EE521 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I agree as well. =20 But as the saying goes, you pick the right tool for the job. =46rom = what I can tell, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. =20 So, to me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its ability = to work with SQL. Options, choices, and flexibility are great things. = It is a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may disappear. I = can understand commerce tags, but SQL is not going out of style. It's = not an industry standard for no reason, albeit more burdensome to work = with than WebDNA native dbs for instance. I think that a +SQL and -SQL = version of WebDNA is appropriate, but I would hate to see it go all = together. On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote: > Chris >=20 > I agree totally. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 03/02/2012, at 10:09 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >=20 >> If i were to name the greatest WebDNA feature, i would say it is its = embedded ultrafast database system. It is so simple to use, so fast, so = easy to learn that i hardly imagine a newcomer going the MySQL way... >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- This message = is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To = unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_40E6542D-0F41-4FC1-9AD8-05E0D59EE521 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii I = agree as well.
But as the saying goes, you = pick the right tool for the job. =46rom what I can tell, there is = no one-size-fits-all solution.
So, to = me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its ability to = work with SQL. Options, choices, and flexibility are great things. = It is a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may = disappear. I can understand commerce tags, but SQL is not going = out of style. It's not an industry standard for no reason, albeit = more burdensome to work with than WebDNA native dbs for instance. = I think that a +SQL and -SQL version of WebDNA is appropriate, but = I would hate to see it go all = together.
On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Stuart Tremain wrote: Chris
I = agree = totally.
If i were to = name the greatest WebDNA feature, i would say it is its embedded = ultrafast database system. It is so simple to use, so fast, so easy to = learn that i hardly imagine a newcomer going the MySQL = way...
--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/l= ist/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us But as the saying goes, you = pick the right tool for the job. =46rom what I can tell, there is = no one-size-fits-all solution.
So, to = me, one of the other great features of WebDNA is also its ability to = work with SQL. Options, choices, and flexibility are great things. = It is a little bit worry-some if one of those choices may = disappear. I can understand commerce tags, but SQL is not going = out of style. It's not an industry standard for no reason, albeit = more burdensome to work with than WebDNA native dbs for instance. = I think that a +SQL and -SQL version of WebDNA is appropriate, but = I would hate to see it go all = together.
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...