Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 15219
interpreted = N
texte = We were running 2.1b3 on OS 7.6.1. We have 15 mb ram for WebCat, our databases total under 4 megs.Karl Schroll www.digitalfrontier.comSandra L. Pitner wrote: > > I should add that we are running the .acgi on the latest Mac OS with > tons of RAM (60? for WebCatalog). Perhaps Karl should consider other > factors like MacOS, RAM etc. > > Sandy > > Sandra L. Pitner wrote: > > > > I agree, 2.1b3 seems downright fiesty compared to b2. Could the RAM > > allocation be too low? It quit on us until we remembered to reset RAM > > settings on the new version. > > > > Sandy > > > > Pat McCormick wrote: > > > > > > Karl Schroll wrote: > > > > > > > > I installed 2.1b3/Mac after getting a signal raised LModel error again > > > > with 2.01. 2.1b3 seems to hog the processor and is _very_ slow when > > > > running all HTML through it. I got lots of gateway application timeout > > > > messages with it. > > > > > > > > I have gone back to 2.01 and the performance is back to normal. > > > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  2. Re: Dismissing dialogs (was 2.1b3 --> way slow) (Karl Schroll 1997)
  3. Dismissing dialogs (was 2.1b3 --> way slow) (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  4. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Sandra L. Pitner 1997)
  6. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Sandra L. Pitner 1997)
  8. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Britt T. 1997)
  9. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  11. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Pat McCormick 1997)
  12. Re: 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
  13. 2.1b3 --> way slow (Karl Schroll 1997)
We were running 2.1b3 on OS 7.6.1. We have 15 mb ram for WebCat, our databases total under 4 megs.Karl Schroll www.digitalfrontier.comSandra L. Pitner wrote: > > I should add that we are running the .acgi on the latest Mac OS with > tons of RAM (60? for WebCatalog). Perhaps Karl should consider other > factors like MacOS, RAM etc. > > Sandy > > Sandra L. Pitner wrote: > > > > I agree, 2.1b3 seems downright fiesty compared to b2. Could the RAM > > allocation be too low? It quit on us until we remembered to reset RAM > > settings on the new version. > > > > Sandy > > > > Pat McCormick wrote: > > > > > > Karl Schroll wrote: > > > > > > > > I installed 2.1b3/Mac after getting a signal raised LModel error again > > > > with 2.01. 2.1b3 seems to hog the processor and is _very_ slow when > > > > running all HTML through it. I got lots of gateway application timeout > > > > messages with it. > > > > > > > > I have gone back to 2.01 and the performance is back to normal. > > > Karl Schroll

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[isfile] ? (1997) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) Install Webcatalog under NT4.0 and Microsoft IIS 2.0 (1997) Snake Bites (1997) OFF-TOPIC: Check www.godaddy.com for me ... (2003) Nested tags count question (1997) Webcat run amuk (2002) Do search engines index .tpl pages? (2006) Math Problem - Format? (1997) Thanks and new Question on lineitems (2002) Incrementing a number (1998) OS X (2000) Lambada for Macintosh is Here! (1996) [Announce] Newest Commerce Site based on WebCatalog (1997) REPLACE problem (2000) OH MY GOD! (1998) Great product and great job ! (1997) select menus & database design (1998) Registration Form (1998) Shopping problems with 2.1b3 acgi (1997)