Re: Other tags inside the founditems context?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 17015
interpreted = N
texte = >Is there ANY WAY that an append context inside the founditems loop will >screw up the internal index in the same manner that using delete inside >the founditems context does?No, that should be fine, since none of the found items will be included in the newly-added ones. There is no overlap.>What about a replace context inside a founditems loop?Replace *may* affect it, because a replace has the potential to change the field values in the list of found records. The code looks like replace would *probably* work (because everything is based on record index), but it hasn't been tested so we can't guarantee it.>What about other tags or contexts inside the founditems context?Only tags that affect database records or databases can be a problem. [CloseDatabase], for instance, would be a bad idea inside a [FoundItems] loop. [FlushDatabases], [Delete], [Replace], would also be bad.Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Other tags inside the founditems context? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  2. Other tags inside the founditems context? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
>Is there ANY WAY that an append context inside the founditems loop will >screw up the internal index in the same manner that using delete inside >the founditems context does?No, that should be fine, since none of the found items will be included in the newly-added ones. There is no overlap.>What about a replace context inside a founditems loop?Replace *may* affect it, because a replace has the potential to change the field values in the list of found records. The code looks like replace would *probably* work (because everything is based on record index), but it hasn't been tested so we can't guarantee it.>What about other tags or contexts inside the founditems context?Only tags that affect database records or databases can be a problem. [closedatabase], for instance, would be a bad idea inside a [founditems] loop. [flushdatabases], [delete], [replace], would also be bad.Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ PCS Technical Support

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

quantity minimum problem (1997) [include] and not found (2005) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997) [ConvertChars] problem (1997) hierarchy question... (2000) PDF Writefile problem (2005) protect tag on NT IIS (1997) Re[2]: (2000) Multiple Search Fields (1998) Sorting by date (1997) Session Number (1998) RequiredFields template (1997) wrong input values? (1997) Getting Started (2003) [WebDNA] PHP and WebDNA together? (2011) Sort Order on a page search (1997) authorizenet/webmerchant part 2 (2000) View order not right (1997) Off-Topic: List of common port numbers? (2002)