RE: Loss in form

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19339
interpreted = N
texte = At 09:12 AM 8/5/98, you wrote: >>At 12:13 AM 8/5/98, Pat McCormick wrote: >>>> From: Kimberly Wyrick [mailto:Kim@cnetech.com] >>>> EEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! It didn't work for me. >>>> I've tried wrap=virtual, wrap=hard, wrap=soft and no wrap attribute at >>>> all.....but nothing after the first carriage return is submitted in the >>>> form. Anyone else have any suggestions? >>> >>>try using this: >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>Nope...still no luck. I also tried the same thing but without the >>[input][/input] but no luck either way. I give up... >> >>Thanks so much for all of your help!! >>Kim > >try wrapping your append in [url] ie.....&comments=[url][comments][/url].... > Thanks Gary, but unfortunately this is a form submitting directly to a [sendmail] and not to a database.Kim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ California Network Engineering, Inc. ~ Hanford, California 93230 ~ Phone: 1-800-997-4CNE ~ Fax: 1-209-585-8888 ~ Email: Kim@cnetech.com ~ Internet: www.cneinc.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Loss in Form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  2. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  3. Re: Loss in Form (Jim V 1998)
  4. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  5. Re: Loss in Form (Peter Ostry 1998)
  6. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  7. Re: Loss in Form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  8. Re: Loss in Form (Steve Rosenbaum 1998)
  9. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  10. Re: Loss in Form (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  11. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  12. RE: Loss in form (Gary Richter 1998)
  13. RE: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  14. RE: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  15. RE: Loss in form (Gary Richter 1998)
  16. RE: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  17. RE: Loss in form (Pat McCormick 1998)
  18. Re: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  19. Re: Loss in form (Peter Ostry 1998)
  20. Re: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  21. Re: Loss in form (Rob Marquardt 1998)
At 09:12 AM 8/5/98, you wrote: >>At 12:13 AM 8/5/98, Pat McCormick wrote: >>>> From: Kimberly Wyrick [mailto:Kim@cnetech.com] >>>> EEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! It didn't work for me. >>>> I've tried wrap=virtual, wrap=hard, wrap=soft and no wrap attribute at >>>> all.....but nothing after the first carriage return is submitted in the >>>> form. Anyone else have any suggestions? >>> >>>try using this: >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>Nope...still no luck. I also tried the same thing but without the >>[input][/input] but no luck either way. I give up... >> >>Thanks so much for all of your help!! >>Kim > >try wrapping your append in [url] ie.....&comments=[url][comments][/url].... > Thanks Gary, but unfortunately this is a form submitting directly to a [sendmail] and not to a database.Kim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ California Network Engineering, Inc. ~ Hanford, California 93230 ~ Phone: 1-800-997-4CNE ~ Fax: 1-209-585-8888 ~ Email: Kim@cnetech.com ~ Internet: www.cneinc.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kimberly Wyrick

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

credit card authorization question (1997) input type=file has no value? (2003) WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) Cancel Subscription (1996) Weird error/limit - something amiss? (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) {Grouping} Docs (1999) list cookies and list http headers (1997) Organisation website (2005) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) Linux uninstall / reinstall (2003) Search with Special Chars (1997) quit sending me mail!!!!! (1999) Pixo support? (1998) Newbie from and old bee (1997) Opposite of Summ=T? (2000) [Sum] function? (1997) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) Shed some light on web delivery? (2000) OH MY GOD! (1998)