RE: Loss in form

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19339
interpreted = N
texte = At 09:12 AM 8/5/98, you wrote: >>At 12:13 AM 8/5/98, Pat McCormick wrote: >>>> From: Kimberly Wyrick [mailto:Kim@cnetech.com] >>>> EEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! It didn't work for me. >>>> I've tried wrap=virtual, wrap=hard, wrap=soft and no wrap attribute at >>>> all.....but nothing after the first carriage return is submitted in the >>>> form. Anyone else have any suggestions? >>> >>>try using this: >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>Nope...still no luck. I also tried the same thing but without the >>[input][/input] but no luck either way. I give up... >> >>Thanks so much for all of your help!! >>Kim > >try wrapping your append in [url] ie.....&comments=[url][comments][/url].... > Thanks Gary, but unfortunately this is a form submitting directly to a [sendmail] and not to a database.Kim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ California Network Engineering, Inc. ~ Hanford, California 93230 ~ Phone: 1-800-997-4CNE ~ Fax: 1-209-585-8888 ~ Email: Kim@cnetech.com ~ Internet: www.cneinc.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Loss in Form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  2. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  3. Re: Loss in Form (Jim V 1998)
  4. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  5. Re: Loss in Form (Peter Ostry 1998)
  6. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  7. Re: Loss in Form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  8. Re: Loss in Form (Steve Rosenbaum 1998)
  9. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  10. Re: Loss in Form (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  11. Re: Loss in Form (Raymond Hatch 1998)
  12. RE: Loss in form (Gary Richter 1998)
  13. RE: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  14. RE: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  15. RE: Loss in form (Gary Richter 1998)
  16. RE: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  17. RE: Loss in form (Pat McCormick 1998)
  18. Re: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  19. Re: Loss in form (Peter Ostry 1998)
  20. Re: Loss in form (Kimberly Wyrick 1998)
  21. Re: Loss in form (Rob Marquardt 1998)
At 09:12 AM 8/5/98, you wrote: >>At 12:13 AM 8/5/98, Pat McCormick wrote: >>>> From: Kimberly Wyrick [mailto:Kim@cnetech.com] >>>> EEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! It didn't work for me. >>>> I've tried wrap=virtual, wrap=hard, wrap=soft and no wrap attribute at >>>> all.....but nothing after the first carriage return is submitted in the >>>> form. Anyone else have any suggestions? >>> >>>try using this: >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>Nope...still no luck. I also tried the same thing but without the >>[input][/input] but no luck either way. I give up... >> >>Thanks so much for all of your help!! >>Kim > >try wrapping your append in [url] ie.....&comments=[url][comments][/url].... > Thanks Gary, but unfortunately this is a form submitting directly to a [sendmail] and not to a database.Kim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ California Network Engineering, Inc. ~ Hanford, California 93230 ~ Phone: 1-800-997-4CNE ~ Fax: 1-209-585-8888 ~ Email: Kim@cnetech.com ~ Internet: www.cneinc.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kimberly Wyrick

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (2008) W* 3.x & WebCat + WebMerchant (1998) Hide Ifs (2000) [ShowIf] a either fields are blank (1998) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) HomePage Caution (1997) Hello??? (1997) WebDNA Speed Test (2008) [cart] Taxrate - seriously .. (2002) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) HELP WITH DATES (1997) price carry over (1997) [OT] Who's got a cool link (2002) DD/MM/YY reseting (1999) Authenticate (1999) (1998) File Uploads: WebCat/SiteEdit (1998) Public beta 6 for WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000) Removing [showif] makes a big difference in speed (1997) RE: date (1998)