Re: ThreadMem ignored?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20601
interpreted = N
texte = >>Is the ThreadMem preference ignored when using the CGI? >>If so, how can I increase it so I can stop getting: >> >>Error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts > >Under 3.0 it is used. But 3.0 has *significantly* better thread memory >hadnling, such that 12K is sufficient for 8 levels of nesting. Is it >possible you have a recursive use of WebDNA?I checked for recursion but I didn't find any. I accessed these very same files a couple of weeks ago with no problem, but now webcat seems to be having a fit for some reason. It displays the error even when there's no webdna except for a single [include] in the page, and that include file has no webdna tags in it, either.I'll check things again, and this time I'll restart before posting to the list again. Restarting has fixed other unusual glitches in the past, so maybe it will work with this problem, who knows ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  2. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (Per Christian Lied 1998)
  3. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  4. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  5. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  6. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  7. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  8. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  9. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  10. Re: ThreadMem ignored? (Gary Richter 1998)
  11. ThreadMem ignored? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
>>Is the ThreadMem preference ignored when using the CGI? >>If so, how can I increase it so I can stop getting: >> >>Error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts > >Under 3.0 it is used. But 3.0 has *significantly* better thread memory >hadnling, such that 12K is sufficient for 8 levels of nesting. Is it >possible you have a recursive use of WebDNA?I checked for recursion but I didn't find any. I accessed these very same files a couple of weeks ago with no problem, but now webcat seems to be having a fit for some reason. It displays the error even when there's no webdna except for a single [include] in the page, and that include file has no webdna tags in it, either.I'll check things again, and this time I'll restart before posting to the list again. Restarting has fixed other unusual glitches in the past, so maybe it will work with this problem, who knows ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

problem: mail changed (1997) [WebDNA] Digest from talk@webdna.us (2018) [ShowIf] if the varieable exists (1998) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) Date Time Oddness (1999) [addlineitems] display (1997) tag request (1999) new cart IDs being assigned somehow (1997) Add sizes from check boxes (2002) 2 easy questions re: [showif] and [sendmail] (1997) WebCat 2.1 & WebStar 4.2 (2000) PROBLEM (1997) Cookies (1999) japanese characters (1997) BBEdit and WebCatalog 2.0? (1997) Validating A Date (2004) Oops, my mistake - (was Bad suffix error) (1997) Help!!!! Purchases not going through! FIXED! (1997) [WebDNA] [OT] Mac Audit Software? (2009) Bug Report, maybe (1997)