RE: redirect with more than 256 characters

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 22542
interpreted = N
texte = As i remember too, the post arguements wont go along through a redirect./Martin >>>I got more than 256 to pass with redirect, but after a certainly number it >>>fails. Doesn't using TCPConnect embedded the results of that page to the >>>current template? I would like to move to a whole new template after my >>>error checking has passed. >> >>I would suggest you to not use [REDIRECT], use [INCLUDE] instead - if all >>the pages involved are located on the same server. >> >>(BTW: I would suspect any Variables set by the latest POST action are still >>availible on the page you redirect your visitor to - but not any [MATH] or >>[TEXT] variables. So a hack would be to pass just those variables.) > >I don't think the POST variables are passed thru on a [redirect]. It seems >I remember this from my testing a long time ago, but I could be mistaken. >Has anyone tested this recently? > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Christer Olsson 1999)
  2. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Martin Bech 1999)
  3. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  4. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Christer Olsson 1999)
  5. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Olin Lagon 1999)
  6. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  7. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Olin Lagon 1999)
  8. Re: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
As i remember too, the post arguements wont go along through a redirect./Martin >>>I got more than 256 to pass with redirect, but after a certainly number it >>>fails. Doesn't using TCPConnect embedded the results of that page to the >>>current template? I would like to move to a whole new template after my >>>error checking has passed. >> >>I would suggest you to not use [redirect], use [include] instead - if all >>the pages involved are located on the same server. >> >>(BTW: I would suspect any Variables set by the latest POST action are still >>availible on the page you redirect your visitor to - but not any [math] or >>[text] variables. So a hack would be to pass just those variables.) > >I don't think the POST variables are passed thru on a [redirect]. It seems >I remember this from my testing a long time ago, but I could be mistaken. >Has anyone tested this recently? > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.net Martin Bech

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[ConvertChars] problem (1997) SandBox and ImageMagick (2003) cart (1997) Emailer port change (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) What are SMSI's upgrade policies? (2003) Concatenating Form Variables (1998) Physical Security for WebCatalog Directories (1997) F3 crashing server (1997) Convert Chars Q (2000) Need help with text area (1998) Snake Bites (1997) [searchString] (1997) Cancel Subscription (1996) Cart Question (1998) LAST CHANCE! Anyone have a one-to-one messaging system? (1999) Weird Math and SV (1997) Signal Raised Error (1997) Concerning Emailer under Linux... does it exist? (2000) [item] appears after 'remove last item' ... (1997)