Re: Server Load

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 28495
interpreted = N
texte = On 3/3/00 9:40 AM, Paul Uttermohlen wrote:>Webcatalog >seems to be faster with Apache, but Starnine promises incredible >speed increases in the next release of Webstar, a tool many of us are >already very familiar with.But if you are planning your future course ... You have to look at what apple is doing. The promise of MacOSX server/client environment is huge. In my mind its the best of all worlds. I am also playing with Win2000 and Linux and in my mind apple has now combined the best server environment with the best client environment. Regardless of the speed, the continued development of apache and apache modules will(in sheer volume) outpace the any development of WebStar. Have you had a look at OS X, it is fastly more complex than the current OS, so if your couning on simplicity then I think you will have to remain in OS 9 for sometime. If your serious about your internet solutions then you have to be serious about the systems they run on.If I were just getting started, then yes I would probably go with Webstar, but I would have a OSX server solution running and I would try to force some development into that realm as well.Sincerely, Robert Minor___________________________________________________________________________CyberMill Communications voice 314-962-4024 8616 Joseph Ave http://www.cybermill.com/ St. Louis, MO 63144 email: webmaster@cybermill.com ___________________________________________________________________________Purveyors of fine Websites and Webhosting services.------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Paul Willis 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Server load ("Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Terry Wilson 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Patrick Junkroski 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Server load ("Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  9. [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  10. Re: Server Load Tester (The Mooseman 2000)
  11. Re: Server Load Tester (Bob Minor 2000)
  12. Re: Server Load Tester (Robie Blair 2000)
  13. Server Load Tester (The Mooseman 2000)
  14. Re: Server Load (Paul Uttermohlen 2000)
  15. Re: Server Load (Bob Minor 2000)
  16. Re: Server Load (Jesse Williams Proudman 2000)
  17. Re: Server Load (Paul Uttermohlen 2000)
  18. Re: Server Load - FIREWIRE (elive talklists 2000)
  19. Re: Server Load (jhowarth 2000)
  20. Re: Server Load (rblair@anythingpc.com (ANY Robie Blair) 2000)
  21. Re: Server Load (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  22. Re: Server Load (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  23. Re: Server Load (Bob Minor 2000)
  24. Re: Server Load (Jesse Williams Proudman 2000)
  25. Re: Server Load (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  26. Server Load (Jesse Williams Proudman 2000)
On 3/3/00 9:40 AM, Paul Uttermohlen wrote:>Webcatalog >seems to be faster with Apache, but Starnine promises incredible >speed increases in the next release of Webstar, a tool many of us are >already very familiar with.But if you are planning your future course ... You have to look at what apple is doing. The promise of MacOSX server/client environment is huge. In my mind its the best of all worlds. I am also playing with Win2000 and Linux and in my mind apple has now combined the best server environment with the best client environment. Regardless of the speed, the continued development of apache and apache modules will(in sheer volume) outpace the any development of WebStar. Have you had a look at OS X, it is fastly more complex than the current OS, so if your couning on simplicity then I think you will have to remain in OS 9 for sometime. If your serious about your internet solutions then you have to be serious about the systems they run on.If I were just getting started, then yes I would probably go with Webstar, but I would have a OSX server solution running and I would try to force some development into that realm as well.Sincerely, Robert Minor___________________________________________________________________________CyberMill Communications voice 314-962-4024 8616 Joseph Ave http://www.cybermill.com/ St. Louis, MO 63144 email: webmaster@cybermill.com ___________________________________________________________________________Purveyors of fine Websites and Webhosting services.------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Separate SSL Server (1997) Format question WC Mac f3 (1997) Question about searching combination of fields (2003) creating an email message (1998) all records returned. (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997) [returnraw] and form variables (1998) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) Comments Please ... Omnis Studio v WC (2001) [orderfile Orders/[cart]] (2000) creating a ShipCosts database (1997) Quiestion (1997) Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search) (2006) [Sum] function? (1997) E-Mail Formatting (2000) Signal Raised error (1997) [WriteFile] problems (1997) [WebDNA] anyone successfully using webdna with paypal's NVP (2008) Writing [raw] to a file (2000) New Command prefs ... (1997)