Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29272
interpreted = N
texte = >ohhh. now us non-experts get it (except for the real hard core newbies). Well to look on the brightside- it happened to a guy smart enough to work around it in about 2 seconds flat, and the rest of us get the benefit of knowing the issue in advance. ;-)(a simple page in the docs listing the illegal var names seems like it be be enough of a 'fix' to me.)-John> > > Well, if max is within a search *tag*, then yes it can be a search parameter. But that's not what I said ... > > I said the [max] tag is inside the search *context*, and in this case max is nothing more than a variable -- just like any other variable -- and it should not be changed arbitrarily by webcatalog. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. IE bug... (was: Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  2. Re[2]: The max=0 issue is a bug ... (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  3. Re[2]: The max=0 issue is a bug ... (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  4. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Mike Davis 2000)
  5. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  6. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Clint Davis 2000)
  7. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Chuck Rice 2000)
  8. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  9. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Mike Davis 2000)
  10. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Chuck Rice 2000)
  11. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  12. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... CALL TO ACTION (Mike Davis 2000)
  13. Re: The max=0 issue is a bug ... (John Butler 2000)
  14. The max=0 issue is a bug ... (Kenneth Grome 2000)
>ohhh. now us non-experts get it (except for the real hard core newbies). Well to look on the brightside- it happened to a guy smart enough to work around it in about 2 seconds flat, and the rest of us get the benefit of knowing the issue in advance. ;-)(a simple page in the docs listing the illegal var names seems like it be be enough of a 'fix' to me.)-John> > > Well, if max is within a search *tag*, then yes it can be a search parameter. But that's not what I said ... > > I said the [max] tag is inside the search *context*, and in this case max is nothing more than a variable -- just like any other variable -- and it should not be changed arbitrarily by webcatalog. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to John Butler

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Is this possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes (1997) [WebDNA] I'm stuck... :-( (2009) Bug? (1997) emailer (1997) WebMerchant 1.6 and SHTML (1997) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) Improperly coded search fails ... (2003) Text limits in NT version? (1997) Textarea (1998) headers (2000) Re[2]: Charting records by state (2000) Will webdna execute before a [redirect]? (1999) RequiredFields template (1997) RE: Purchased cart being overwritten (1997) [searchString] (1997) Smart caching problems with 2.1b3? (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) Sorting Numbers (1997) WEBCAT with SQL backend. Help please! (2000) syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)