Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29372
interpreted = N
texte = I do like this method but I also like the [ brackets ]What if we had:[DNA_loop start=1&end=10] [DNAindex] [/DNAloop]and you could pick.I also don't want to have to put in the header of any of my pages. Infact I really don't want to put anything in the header of my pages. :)So if we could stick with the old method but add DNA to every tag I would like that.You have to be careful though - Microsoft is pushing their DNA technology and I believe Motorola has Digital DNA technology. Just touchy ground... Jesse Proudman - NineWire Productions http://www.ninewire.com <-> jesse@ninewire.com Innovative and Creative Web Design and Hosting> -----Original Message----- > From: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com > [mailto:webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Charles Kline > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 5:05 AM > To: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com > Subject: Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 > > > Grant, > > I think this is the most logical way to go, it allows us to use what > we already know with the smallest of changes. > > > > > > > > > Also, doing a global find/replace on existing code to the new > standard, would be a breeze. > > - Charles > > > > > >Hey guys, we are entering into the decision phase for our DreamWeaver > >syntax for 4.0, and I'd like to open up a small discussion to help me > >decide which way to go. This information is confidential, and should > >not be discussed outside this list. > > > >Background: WebDNA's [] syntax tends to make most GUI editors like > >DreamWeaver get confused. We decided Mohammed should go to the > >mountain in this case, so we are modifying WebCatalog's syntax to > >match what GUI editors expect to see. > > > >So for 4.0, one can optionally write two different kinds of > snytax in WebDNA: > > > >[Loop start=1&end=10] > >[index] > >[/Loop] > > > >or > > > > > > > > > > > >This works well for most contexts, but there are a few exceptions > >that can confuse most parsers. Specifically, ShowIf can contain > >characters like > which look just like HTML to a parser: > > > >3> > > ^ looks a lot like followed by a 3 > > > >...so one solution is to force all contexts to use named/quoted > parameters: > > > >3> > > > >..but that's really starting to look stupid. I'm not so worried > >about the amount of typing involved, because the GUI editor is going > >to be doing most of the work anyway, but it still looks pretty weird, > >and I think it's hard to follow. > > > >Another solution would be to change the syntax of ShowIf itself: > > > > > > > >...but I don't like this one because it requires a lot more than a > >simple global search and replace in a text editor to make this kind > >of change to pre-existing old-style WebDNA code. > > > >There's also a hybrid approach that would allow both a named- and > >non-named syntax to be allowed: > > > >3> or 3> > > > >The first is more easily readable by people hand-tying the code, and > >the second is more easily parsed by GUI editors. I'm leaning toward > >that one. > > > >Thanks for your feedback! > > > >Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** > >Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) > >16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- > >San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development > >Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com > > Fax: (858) 675-0372 > ********************************** > > > >############################################################# > >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > > >Send administrative queries to > > > > ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > Send administrative queries to > > > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  2. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Will Starck 2000)
  3. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  4. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  5. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Charles Kline 2000)
  6. Re[2]: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  7. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  8. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  9. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  10. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  11. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Matt Helbing 2000)
  12. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  13. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  14. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Thomas Wedderburn-Bisshop 2000)
  15. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  16. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Brice Le Blevennec 2000)
  17. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Brice Le Blevennec 2000)
  18. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  19. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Bob Minor 2000)
  20. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  21. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  22. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  23. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  24. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Charles Kline 2000)
  25. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Peter Ostry 2000)
  26. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Thomas Wedderburn-Bisshop 2000)
  27. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Brian Wallace 2000)
  28. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  29. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Peter Ostry 2000)
  30. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Mike Davis 2000)
  31. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jym Duane 2000)
  32. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  33. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  34. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jym Duane 2000)
  35. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Clement Ross 2000)
  36. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Chuck Rice 2000)
  37. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Nitai 2000)
  38. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  39. New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
I do like this method but I also like the [ brackets ]What if we had:[DNA_loop start=1&end=10] [DNAindex] [/DNAloop]and you could pick.I also don't want to have to put in the header of any of my pages. Infact I really don't want to put anything in the header of my pages. :)So if we could stick with the old method but add DNA to every tag I would like that.You have to be careful though - Microsoft is pushing their DNA technology and I believe Motorola has Digital DNA technology. Just touchy ground... Jesse Proudman - NineWire Productions http://www.ninewire.com <-> jesse@ninewire.com Innovative and Creative Web Design and Hosting> -----Original Message----- > From: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com > [mailto:webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Charles Kline > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 5:05 AM > To: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com > Subject: Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 > > > Grant, > > I think this is the most logical way to go, it allows us to use what > we already know with the smallest of changes. > > > > > > > > > Also, doing a global find/replace on existing code to the new > standard, would be a breeze. > > - Charles > > > > > >Hey guys, we are entering into the decision phase for our DreamWeaver > >syntax for 4.0, and I'd like to open up a small discussion to help me > >decide which way to go. This information is confidential, and should > >not be discussed outside this list. > > > >Background: WebDNA's [] syntax tends to make most GUI editors like > >DreamWeaver get confused. We decided Mohammed should go to the > >mountain in this case, so we are modifying WebCatalog's syntax to > >match what GUI editors expect to see. > > > >So for 4.0, one can optionally write two different kinds of > snytax in WebDNA: > > > >[Loop start=1&end=10] > >[index] > >[/Loop] > > > >or > > > > > > > > > > > >This works well for most contexts, but there are a few exceptions > >that can confuse most parsers. Specifically, ShowIf can contain > >characters like > which look just like HTML to a parser: > > > >3> > > ^ looks a lot like followed by a 3 > > > >...so one solution is to force all contexts to use named/quoted > parameters: > > > >3> > > > >..but that's really starting to look stupid. I'm not so worried > >about the amount of typing involved, because the GUI editor is going > >to be doing most of the work anyway, but it still looks pretty weird, > >and I think it's hard to follow. > > > >Another solution would be to change the syntax of ShowIf itself: > > > > > > > >...but I don't like this one because it requires a lot more than a > >simple global search and replace in a text editor to make this kind > >of change to pre-existing old-style WebDNA code. > > > >There's also a hybrid approach that would allow both a named- and > >non-named syntax to be allowed: > > > >3> or 3> > > > >The first is more easily readable by people hand-tying the code, and > >the second is more easily parsed by GUI editors. I'm leaning toward > >that one. > > > >Thanks for your feedback! > > > >Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** > >Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) > >16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- > >San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development > >Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com > > Fax: (858) 675-0372 > ********************************** > > > >############################################################# > >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > > the mailing list . > >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > > >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > > >Send administrative queries to > > > > ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > Send administrative queries to > > > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

& Problem in Textarea (1999) Finer than a second. (2001) Where is Typhoon 3.x? (2000) Simple Store (2000) Nav. 4 probs with cart - Serious problem (1997) [GetMIMEHeader] does not work (under Linux?) (2000) Shipping costs again (1998) Auto Archives, Gift Certs, and More.. (2003) Showing unopened cart (1997) What really killed WebDNA? (2007) All orders are failing (2002) Error: could not create email file in EMailFolder. (2003) Searching Issue (2003) Weird Math and SV (1997) ShippingCosts (1998) [WriteFile] problems (1997) StoreBuilder and PayPal (2002) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA not parsing php files (2012) [shell] (2002)