Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29536
interpreted = N
texte = On 3/22/00 6:29 pm, Grant Hulbert so noted...>>> 3> >> >>That's nice. Can it survive if its called something other than 'value'? >> >>3> > >By survive, you mean will WebDNA still understand that it should use >the value of t instead of value for its comparison? I doubt it. >I think the name would have to be well-defined. > >Perhaps > >3> >3> >3>I would find it handy, if it didn't appreciably slow down WebCat's parsing of the code, to have abbreviations available for the parameter names. ie:3> 3> 3>and respectively would be equivalent.(and another plea to replace the underscore with a period ; )Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design800 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis MN 55401 612.330.9863 v 612.321.9424 f www.toastdesign.com ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  2. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Will Starck 2000)
  3. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  4. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  5. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Charles Kline 2000)
  6. Re[2]: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  7. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  8. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  9. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  10. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  11. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
On 3/22/00 6:29 pm, Grant Hulbert so noted...>>> 3> >> >>That's nice. Can it survive if its called something other than 'value'? >> >>3> > >By survive, you mean will WebDNA still understand that it should use >the value of t instead of value for its comparison? I doubt it. >I think the name would have to be well-defined. > >Perhaps > >3> >3> >3>I would find it handy, if it didn't appreciably slow down WebCat's parsing of the code, to have abbreviations available for the parameter names. ie:3> 3> 3>and respectively would be equivalent.(and another plea to replace the underscore with a period ; )Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design800 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis MN 55401 612.330.9863 v 612.321.9424 f www.toastdesign.com ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Rob Marquardt

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Separate SSL Server (1997) still having shipCost.db Problem (1997) No spaces allowed in text variable names ... ? (2002) Missing something simple? (1999) pc (1997) ConvertChars (1998) another problem (1997) WebCat is different user (1999) Append command (2000) Improved ISAPI extension (2004) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) [WebDNA] [OT] Apple iPad (2010) setting taxable to true (1997) attachment stupidity... (2001) WebDelivery: One step closer !! (1997) Hyperlink in email (2002) How do you TEAM Code? (2004) PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) Try not to laugh (2007) RE: (1997)