Re: Validation
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29430
interpreted = N
texte = >Just so you know I have run into trouble using this command set. No response>from SM but having this in my pages caused crashes on an NT. In fact I had>trouble responding to their automated system.>>[listwords Words=[referrer]&delimiters=?][!]> [/!][showif [index]=1][word][/showif][!]> [/!][/listwords]>>I would not get WebCat errors in the enchanced error log nor would I get any>pertinent data from the regular webcat error log. It was just a hunch and>removing it cleared up the problem.I have seen several situations where your:[!][/!]technique for breaking webdna code into shorter lines prevents it from executing properly. So even though I started using that technique long before anyone ever mentioned it on the talk list, I refuse to use it anymore, because it is unrelaible and causes problems -- which should not exist based on the way webdna code is *supposedly* parsed by webcatalog.================================Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant808-737-6499 http://webdna.net================================-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Just so you know I have run into trouble using this command set. No response>from SM but having this in my pages caused crashes on an NT. In fact I had>trouble responding to their automated system.>>[listwords Words=[referrer]&delimiters=?][!]> [/!][showif [index]=1][word][/showif][!]> [/!][/listwords]>>I would not get WebCat errors in the enchanced error log nor would I get any>pertinent data from the regular webcat error log. It was just a hunch and>removing it cleared up the problem.I have seen several situations where your:[!][/!]technique for breaking webdna code into shorter lines prevents it from executing properly. So even though I started using that technique long before anyone ever mentioned it on the Talk List, I refuse to use it anymore, because it is unrelaible and causes problems -- which should not exist based on the way webdna code is *supposedly* parsed by webcatalog.================================Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant808-737-6499 http://webdna.net================================-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Forum Question (2002)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
I'm having trouble using [url][interpret][math] together inlookup (1997)
docs for WebCatalog2 (1997)
ALL CAPS converted to All Caps - first letter capitalizedonly (2002)
Weird Math and SV (1997)
StoreBuilder help/question (2000)
sendmail and attachments (2004)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997)
Re[2]: Editor? (2000)
taxTotal, grandTotal (1997)
Webcat2, WebCommerce, Mod 10 etc. (1997)
Moment of Thanks (1997)
RE: OK, here goes... (1997)
Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)
searching problem (1998)
Emailer (1999)
PR: WebCatalog Affiliates Program Announced -- Share the revenue for promoting WebCatalog (2000)
Date stamp and purging (1998)
Creating main- and sub-category search (1997)