Re: more Dreamweaver Extensions feedback

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35737
interpreted = N
texte = AAAHH! Dana, quick go drown yourself.... you have been possessed by the spirit Ken ;)>At 9:20 PM 8/2/2000, Dana E Keil wrote: > >>Before you squint too long at that results.tpl file, BTW, fill in the >>missing tag; the Dreamweaver display is even worse when that's >>missing. >> > >Replying to myself, no maybe I should go one better and flame myself! > >YOU IDIOT!!!!! > >The reason why there's no tag is because it's in the include >file, you jerk; anybody with half a brain could see that. > >Then, for the sake of efficiency, I'll go ahead and answer myself >here rather than clogging everyone's inbox with another message. > >I resent being called an idiot, especially in ALLCAPS. > >Besides, that doesn't change the fact that coding it that way means >that Dreamweaver won't display it nice -- it drops most of the >following tags because it doesn't have a tag. > >-- >Dana >############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: more Dreamweaver Extensions feedback (Charles Kline 2000)
  2. Re: more Dreamweaver Extensions feedback (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  3. Re: more Dreamweaver Extensions feedback (Dana E. Keil 2000)
  4. more Dreamweaver Extensions feedback (Dana E Keil 2000)
AAAHH! Dana, quick go drown yourself.... you have been possessed by the spirit Ken ;)>At 9:20 PM 8/2/2000, Dana E Keil wrote: > >>Before you squint too long at that results.tpl file, BTW, fill in the >>missing tag; the Dreamweaver display is even worse when that's >>missing. >> > >Replying to myself, no maybe I should go one better and flame myself! > >YOU IDIOT!!!!! > >The reason why there's no tag is because it's in the include >file, you jerk; anybody with half a brain could see that. > >Then, for the sake of efficiency, I'll go ahead and answer myself >here rather than clogging everyone's inbox with another message. > >I resent being called an idiot, especially in ALLCAPS. > >Besides, that doesn't change the fact that coding it that way means >that Dreamweaver won't display it nice -- it drops most of the >following tags because it doesn't have a tag. > >-- >Dana >############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Charles Kline

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (1997) Text vs. Math (2000) Generating Report Totals (1997) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Bit off subject -- Faxing orders (1997) Sample Tearoom Search Error (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) RE: [BULK] RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA for Windows Newbie Questions (2008) iTools and 3.0.8 (2000) Mac webcatalog3_0_5b11 more dead lock throws (1999) WC Database Format (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) PCS Frames (1997) I give up!! (1997) Passing Variables.. yikes, I'm dumb (2000) using showpage and showcart commands (1996) [WebDNA] Processor Maxing out (2010) Bug (feature) in v6 listfiles shows hidden files ... (2004)