Re: code to phantom spacing

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2001


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 36681
interpreted = N
texte = > > Jon Robinson wrote: > > > > Kenneth and John, > > > > Thanks very much for your replies! Sounds like this has been an > issue for > > you two before to some extent. I was actually surpassed that I > didn't find > > it in the archives, as I can hardly believe that no one else is writing > > volumes of code and experiencing the same thing. Makes me wonder if I'm > > making some rookie mistake! > > > > So, here's what I've done: > > > > I've applied method one to an extent but wore out on it (1300+ > lines of code > > after all, and as you said John, no more adjustments after > that, yuk!). It > > seemed to be making some difference. Would it solve the issue, > don't know. > > > > I did not apply method two for much of the same reasons I wore > out on one, > > although it sound like I could edit. > > > > The first two have carpal tunnel written all over them, so I > was really > > hoping that method three would work out. For method three, I placed the > > [converchars] just after the and closed it > > [/convertchars] after the (I even tried adding a few chars to > > replace: %09, %20). > > I am not clear from following the various replies whether you still are > having some problems, or if the embedded lines in the template were the > problem in the first place. However, I can tell you this: if you are > worried about having to type the [!][/!] pairs into your code manually, > then you are using the wrong editor. All modern editors have the > ability to Search/Replace on various characters, including EOL. I use > MultiEdit for Windows (and highly recommend it) and I know others use > BBEdit as well. Both can easily handle adding the [!]'s completely > automatically. > > HTH > > John Peacock > John,Indeed we can as well. Never came across the need for such a fiendish search and replace -he he. But we have affected the [!][/!] pairs insertion! And it reduced the return code.Unfortunately only down to 275K. Still whopping!Thanks again for your efforts!Jon __________________________ Jon Robinson Chakra5 studios http://www.chakra5.netjon@chakra5.net (206) 781-0140 (o) (206) 228-0451 (c) ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: code to phantom spacing (Glenn Busbin 2001)
  2. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  3. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  4. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  5. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  6. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  7. Re: code to phantom spacing (Brian Fries 2001)
  8. Re: code to phantom spacing (John Peacock 2001)
  9. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  10. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  11. Re: Was Re: code to phantom spacing -- now BBEdit [!][/!] (Paolo Coppo 2001)
  12. Re: Was Re: code to phantom spacing -- now BBEdit [!][/!] (John Peacock 2001)
  13. Re: Was Re: code to phantom spacing -- now BBEdit [!][/!] (dale 2001)
  14. Was Re: code to phantom spacing -- now BBEdit [!][/!] (Christopher Mackay 2001)
  15. Re: code to phantom spacing (John Peacock 2001)
  16. Re: code to phantom spacing (Samuel Renkert 2001)
  17. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  18. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  19. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  20. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  21. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  22. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  23. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  24. Re: code to phantom spacing (Glenn Busbin 2001)
  25. Re: code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
  26. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  27. Re: code to phantom spacing (John Peacock 2001)
  28. Re: code to phantom spacing (Kenneth Grome 2001)
  29. code to phantom spacing (Jon Robinson 2001)
> > Jon Robinson wrote: > > > > Kenneth and John, > > > > Thanks very much for your replies! Sounds like this has been an > issue for > > you two before to some extent. I was actually surpassed that I > didn't find > > it in the archives, as I can hardly believe that no one else is writing > > volumes of code and experiencing the same thing. Makes me wonder if I'm > > making some rookie mistake! > > > > So, here's what I've done: > > > > I've applied method one to an extent but wore out on it (1300+ > lines of code > > after all, and as you said John, no more adjustments after > that, yuk!). It > > seemed to be making some difference. Would it solve the issue, > don't know. > > > > I did not apply method two for much of the same reasons I wore > out on one, > > although it sound like I could edit. > > > > The first two have carpal tunnel written all over them, so I > was really > > hoping that method three would work out. For method three, I placed the > > [converchars] just after the and closed it > > [/convertchars] after the (I even tried adding a few chars to > > replace: %09, %20). > > I am not clear from following the various replies whether you still are > having some problems, or if the embedded lines in the template were the > problem in the first place. However, I can tell you this: if you are > worried about having to type the [!][/!] pairs into your code manually, > then you are using the wrong editor. All modern editors have the > ability to Search/Replace on various characters, including EOL. I use > MultiEdit for Windows (and highly recommend it) and I know others use > BBEdit as well. Both can easily handle adding the [!]'s completely > automatically. > > HTH > > John Peacock > John,Indeed we can as well. Never came across the need for such a fiendish search and replace -he he. But we have affected the [!][/!] pairs insertion! And it reduced the return code.Unfortunately only down to 275K. Still whopping!Thanks again for your efforts!Jon __________________________ Jon Robinson Chakra5 studios http://www.chakra5.netjon@chakra5.net (206) 781-0140 (o) (206) 228-0451 (c) ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Jon Robinson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Attention all list readers (1997) [WebDNA] Succesfull migration from WebDNA/AppleServer to (2018) Header Values won't take. (1998) WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 - PIXO (1997) Multiple Sendmail Tags on One Page (2008) Unexpected comparison behavior change in 4.5.1 (2003) WebCatalog/WebMerchant 2.1 (1998) Merging databases (1997) Nav. 4 probs with cart - Serious problem (1997) No Data (1997) preference to using Apache 2.x or 1.3.x with WebDNA 6.0? (2004) Sorting error (1997) [BULK] [WebDNA] Debian Lighttpd WebDNA testbed server ... (2012) Cookie Question (1999) WC site (2001) Database Locking?!? (2000) AddLineitems - 100 Item Limit? (2002) [WebDNA] help with [ReturnRaw] - why is it killing the parse of the [include] file? (2009) Carrying over data? (1997) What about that Cc and Bcc bug? (2000)