Re: I think I found a bug

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2001


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 37070
interpreted = N
texte = Curiosity got the best of me and I played with this a bit...It looks like the max= parameter works the same in [replace] as it does in [search] -- if the max= value is not a positive integer, the parameter is ignored, resulting in all found records being listed / replaced.I would not call this a bug, just an unspecified behavior resulting from providing an out-of-range value for a parameter.- BrianAt 4:54 PM 7/9/2001, Arturo Vargas wrote: >Reading the docs I was given the impression that [replace] had the same >parameters as [search] > >and this is correct for instance I have been using successfully the max >parameter with replace. But recently some one entered 0 as the max parameter >in this [replace] and every single entry was replaced. as if the max >parameter wasn't there. I wonder if there is some kind of reason for the >number 0 to not work with the max parameter. Does any body know if this is a >bug of webcat or is there a reason for max=0 to not work. > >Arturo Vargas -- <= Brian C. Fries, BrainScan Software http://www.brainscansoftware.com =>------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: I think I found a bug (Brian Fries 2001)
  2. Re: I think I found a bug (Andrew Simpson 2001)
  3. Re: I think I found a bug (Brian Fries 2001)
  4. I think I found a bug (Arturo Vargas 2001)
Curiosity got the best of me and I played with this a bit...It looks like the max= parameter works the same in [replace] as it does in [search] -- if the max= value is not a positive integer, the parameter is ignored, resulting in all found records being listed / replaced.I would not call this a bug, just an unspecified behavior resulting from providing an out-of-range value for a parameter.- BrianAt 4:54 PM 7/9/2001, Arturo Vargas wrote: >Reading the docs I was given the impression that [replace] had the same >parameters as [search] > >and this is correct for instance I have been using successfully the max >parameter with replace. But recently some one entered 0 as the max parameter >in this [replace] and every single entry was replaced. as if the max >parameter wasn't there. I wonder if there is some kind of reason for the >number 0 to not work with the max parameter. Does any body know if this is a >bug of webcat or is there a reason for max=0 to not work. > >Arturo Vargas -- <= Brian C. Fries, BrainScan Software http://www.brainscansoftware.com =>------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RAM variables (1997) Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997) ShowNext Context (2004) Where is f2? (1997) CSS in HTML emails? (2003) Conditional searching & displaying (1997) Problem displaying search result (1997) WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997) oops private message leaked into talk list (1997) RE: Displaying Location (1997) Webstar 1.3.1 PPC (1997) Upgrade to wsV (2004) converting tabs (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) Question about [encrypt] (1998) Random letter and/or number (2001) Re:E-Mailer (WebCatb15acgiMac) (1997) New Command prefs ... (1997) Fields/Forms Processing (1998) Tax on shipping (1998)