Re: I think I found a bug

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2001

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 37071
interpreted = N
texte = So a bug would be an unspecified behaviour resulting from providing acorrect and valid value as a parameter???-Andrew.on 10/7/01 12:18 PM, Brian Fries at brainscn@psyber.com wrote:> Curiosity got the best of me and I played with this a bit...> > It looks like the max= parameter works the same in [replace] as it> does in [search] -- if the max= value is not a positive integer, the> parameter is ignored, resulting in all found records being listed /> replaced.> > I would not call this a bug, just an unspecified behavior resulting> from providing an out-of-range value for a parameter.> > - Brian> > At 4:54 PM 7/9/2001, Arturo Vargas wrote:>> Reading the docs I was given the impression that [replace] had the same>> parameters as [search]>> >> and this is correct for instance I have been using successfully the max>> parameter with replace. But recently some one entered 0 as the max parameter>> in this [replace] and every single entry was replaced. as if the max>> parameter wasn't there. I wonder if there is some kind of reason for the>> number 0 to not work with the max parameter. Does any body know if this is a>> bug of webcat or is there a reason for max=0 to not work.>> >> Arturo Vargas-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: I think I found a bug (Brian Fries 2001)
Re: I think I found a bug (Andrew Simpson 2001)
Re: I think I found a bug (Brian Fries 2001)
I think I found a bug (Arturo Vargas 2001)

So a bug would be an unspecified behaviour resulting from providing acorrect and valid value as a parameter???-Andrew.on 10/7/01 12:18 PM, Brian Fries at brainscn@psyber.com wrote:> Curiosity got the best of me and I played with this a bit...> > It looks like the max= parameter works the same in [replace] as it> does in [search] -- if the max= value is not a positive integer, the> parameter is ignored, resulting in all found records being listed /> replaced.> > I would not call this a bug, just an unspecified behavior resulting> from providing an out-of-range value for a parameter.> > - Brian> > At 4:54 PM 7/9/2001, Arturo Vargas wrote:>> Reading the docs I was given the impression that [replace] had the same>> parameters as [search]>> >> and this is correct for instance I have been using successfully the max>> parameter with replace. But recently some one entered 0 as the max parameter>> in this [replace] and every single entry was replaced. as if the max>> parameter wasn't there. I wonder if there is some kind of reason for the>> number 0 to not work with the max parameter. Does any body know if this is a>> bug of webcat or is there a reason for max=0 to not work.>> >> Arturo Vargas-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Andrew Simpson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: I think I found a bug

2001

Top Articles:

Related Readings: