Re: Suggestion: appendfounditems
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40536
interpreted = N
texte = Natai, how does the appendfounditems get its values and how does it knowwhat fields to replace? If you are just giving it a new sku where does itget the rest of the values.?DonovanComputerOil Nitai wrote:> Hi SMSI,>> Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a> [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems].>> With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to:>> [search]> [founditems]>> [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append]>> [/founditems]> [/search]>> With the new tag we could:>> [search]>> [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems]>> [/search]>> Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because> [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain> in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields.>> Thank you for consider this suggestion.>> Sincerely,> Nitai>> -->-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Natai, how does the appendfounditems get its values and how does it knowwhat fields to replace? If you are just giving it a new sku where does itget the rest of the values.?DonovanComputerOil Nitai wrote:> Hi SMSI,>> Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a> [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems].>> With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to:>> [search]> [founditems]>> [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append]>> [/founditems]> [/search]>> With the new tag we could:>> [search]>> [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems]>> [/search]>> Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because> [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain> in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields.>> Thank you for consider this suggestion.>> Sincerely,> Nitai>> -->-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
how do I delete 1 of 2 identical records? (2003)
Help with nested search (1998)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
[append] vs. [appendfile] delta + question? (1997)
return two fields w/ [lookup] (1998)
Nested searches (1998)
OT: Windows-based Code Editor (2002)
Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997)
Set Cookie for Multiple Domain Extensions (2005)
method of payment (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
webcatalog [date] bug...not (1999)
WebCat2b12 Mac.acgi--[searchstring] bug (1997)
FAX orders (1996)
Shipping Help! (1998)
Web Developer Product Awards (1997)
change the number format (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
not interpreting Q (2001)