Re: Suggestion: appendfounditems
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40536
interpreted = N
texte = Natai, how does the appendfounditems get its values and how does it know what fields to replace? If you are just giving it a new sku where does it get the rest of the values.?Donovan ComputerOil Nitai wrote:> Hi SMSI, > > Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a > [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems]. > > With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to: > > [search] > [founditems] > > [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append] > > [/founditems] > [/search] > > With the new tag we could: > > [search] > > [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems] > > [/search] > > Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because > [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain > in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields. > > Thank you for consider this suggestion. > > Sincerely, > Nitai > > -- >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Natai, how does the appendfounditems get its values and how does it know what fields to replace? If you are just giving it a new sku where does it get the rest of the values.?Donovan ComputerOil Nitai wrote:> Hi SMSI, > > Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a > [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems]. > > With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to: > > [search] > [founditems] > > [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append] > > [/founditems] > [/search] > > With the new tag we could: > > [search] > > [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems] > > [/search] > > Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because > [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain > in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields. > > Thank you for consider this suggestion. > > Sincerely, > Nitai > > -- >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
OK, here goes... (1997)
[SHOWNEXT] Examples (1997)
Database Repopulation (2004)
quitting (1997)
SQL db type (2006)
[isfile] ? (1997)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
[tcp connect] (1998)
Document Contains No Data! (1997)
RequiredFields template (1997)
unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997)
WCf2 and nested tags (1997)
Error Log.db --however (1997)
Databases (2000)
Size limit for tmpl editor ? (1997)
[WebDNA] Basic Search (2008)
[WebDNA] Function "libraries" (2009)
Display [price] in banner ad (1998)
[WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (2012)
This might sound silly... (2000)