Re: Suggestion: appendfounditems
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40539
interpreted = N
texte = I use this which works very well,(webstar, mac, 0S 9.1) all you need to do is replace the db_is=value with your dbs name, and unique_field=SKU field name with your unique field name, and your search context. Once you remove the comments it isn't so long. If you use the old [date %Y%m%d][time %H%M%S] to generate you original skus you should be able to leave the new_unique_field_value below alone. Although it will make your new sku longer in length than [date %Y%m%d][time %H%M%S]. It duplicates 1000 records in a db with 5000 records & 10 fields in 6 seconds. [text]db_is=books_li.db[/text] [text]unique_field=SKU[/text] [text]dup_search=neSKUdata=findall[/text] [text]db_fields=[ListFields [db_is]][hideif [fieldname]=[unique_field]][FieldName]=[[FieldName]]&[/hideif][/ListFields][ /text] [search db=[db_is]&[dup_search]][numfound] [founditems] [!]-----------------------// you need to find a new unique_field value for the append. depending on your db unique_field I use [math][sku]+[index][/math] because my field is numeric and called sku----------[/!] [text]new_unique_field_value=[interpret][[unique_field]][/interpret][index][ /text][!]-----------------------// copies all the fields except sku back into the db from the found set----------[/!] [append db=[db_is]][interpret][db_fields][/interpret][unique_field]=[new_unique_fiel d_value][/append] [/founditems] [/search]Good luck > Hi SMSI, > > Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a > [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems]. > > With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to: > > [search] > [founditems] > > [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append] > > [/founditems] > [/search] > > With the new tag we could: > > [search] > > [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems] > > [/search] > > Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because > [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain > in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields. > > Thank you for consider this suggestion. > > Sincerely, > Nitai ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I use this which works very well,(webstar, mac, 0S 9.1) all you need to do is replace the db_is=value with your dbs name, and unique_field=SKU field name with your unique field name, and your search context. Once you remove the comments it isn't so long. If you use the old [date %Y%m%d][time %H%M%S] to generate you original skus you should be able to leave the new_unique_field_value below alone. Although it will make your new sku longer in length than [date %Y%m%d][time %H%M%S]. It duplicates 1000 records in a db with 5000 records & 10 fields in 6 seconds. [text]db_is=books_li.db[/text] [text]unique_field=SKU[/text] [text]dup_search=neSKUdata=findall[/text] [text]db_fields=[ListFields [db_is]][hideif [fieldname]=[unique_field]][FieldName]=[[FieldName]]&[/hideif][/ListFields][ /text] [search db=[db_is]&[dup_search]][numfound] [founditems] [!]-----------------------// you need to find a new unique_field value for the append. depending on your db unique_field I use [math][sku]+[index][/math] because my field is numeric and called sku----------[/!] [text]new_unique_field_value=[interpret][[unique_field]][/interpret][index][ /text][!]-----------------------// copies all the fields except sku back into the db from the found set----------[/!] [append db=[db_is]][interpret][db_fields][/interpret][unique_field]=[new_unique_fiel d_value][/append] [/founditems] [/search]Good luck > Hi SMSI, > > Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a > [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems]. > > With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to: > > [search] > [founditems] > > [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append] > > [/founditems] > [/search] > > With the new tag we could: > > [search] > > [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems] > > [/search] > > Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because > [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain > in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields. > > Thank you for consider this suggestion. > > Sincerely, > Nitai ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
marc malacarme
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Any help gratefully appreciated (2001)
Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (2003)
Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997)
no template caching (1997)
ShipCosts database (1997)
[Sum] function? (1997)
Authorize.net? (2003)
authenticating a second user, the sequel (1997)
EIMS Problems (1997)
[convertChars] and in a textarea on a form (1998)
Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997)
5.0 Pricing (2003)
Carriage Returns on mail receipt (2002)
multi-paragraph fields (1997)
WebCat2b12plugin - [search] is broken ... not! (1997)
New Problem (1997)
[WebDNA] Best practice re: password storage (2013)
Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)
Adding To items to cart at once (1999)
Cart doesn't interpret tag! (1997)