Re: Suggestion: appendfounditems
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40537
interpreted = N
texte = It would take the fields from the search. Plus we donıt need to replace records we need to copy them to a new record in the db. The new value just needs to have a unique id.If there are any fieldnames within the [appendfounditems] context then those fields would be replaced with the new values, but the rest of the fields would just be copied over.Of course if WebDNA would have a [copyrecord db=somedatabase.db&eqiddata=1] command and replace the id with 1_copy, it would just be as good, but I find the [appendfounditems] more flexible.Do I make sense?Sincerely, NitaiOn 11.6.2002 3:06 PM, Donovan
wrote:> Natai, how does the appendfounditems get its values and how does it know > what fields to replace? If you are just giving it a new sku where does it > get the rest of the values.? > > Donovan > > > ComputerOil Nitai wrote: > >> Hi SMSI, >> >> Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a >> [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems]. >> >> With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to: >> >> [search] >> [founditems] >> >> [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append] >> >> [/founditems] >> [/search] >> >> With the new tag we could: >> >> [search] >> >> [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems] >> >> [/search] >> >> Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because >> [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain >> in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields. >> >> Thank you for consider this suggestion. >> >> Sincerely, >> Nitai >> >> -- >> > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > <><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/-- Tools to energize business Content Management & eBusiness SystemsComputerOil GmbH http://computeroil.com/ Hauptstrasse 12 info@computeroil.com 8252 Schlatt/Switzerland Tel: +41 (0)52 654 15 55 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
It would take the fields from the search. Plus we donıt need to replace records we need to copy them to a new record in the db. The new value just needs to have a unique id.If there are any fieldnames within the [appendfounditems] context then those fields would be replaced with the new values, but the rest of the fields would just be copied over.Of course if WebDNA would have a [copyrecord db=somedatabase.db&eqiddata=1] command and replace the id with 1_copy, it would just be as good, but I find the [appendfounditems] more flexible.Do I make sense?Sincerely, NitaiOn 11.6.2002 3:06 PM, Donovan wrote:> Natai, how does the appendfounditems get its values and how does it know > what fields to replace? If you are just giving it a new sku where does it > get the rest of the values.? > > Donovan > > > ComputerOil Nitai wrote: > >> Hi SMSI, >> >> Sometimes we need to copy a record and for this it would be great to have a >> [appendfoundrecords] tag, sort of like the [replacefounditems]. >> >> With the current settings, to be able to copy a record, we need to: >> >> [search] >> [founditems] >> >> [append]fieldname1=[xxxx]&fieldname2=xxxx&etc...[/append] >> >> [/founditems] >> [/search] >> >> With the new tag we could: >> >> [search] >> >> [appendfounditems]sku=[newsku][/appendfounditems] >> >> [/search] >> >> Thus we would NOT need to add all the fieldnames in a append tag, because >> [appendfounditems] would just do that for us. The current method is a pain >> in the rear when one has over 20 or more fields. >> >> Thank you for consider this suggestion. >> >> Sincerely, >> Nitai >> >> -- >> > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > <><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/-- Tools to energize business Content Management & eBusiness SystemsComputerOil GmbH http://computeroil.com/ Hauptstrasse 12 info@computeroil.com 8252 Schlatt/Switzerland Tel: +41 (0)52 654 15 55 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
ComputerOil Nitai
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
(long) Support (was wo search help) (1999)
simple answer? [hideif] (1997)
E-Mailer (WebCatb15acgiMac) (1997)
Fufillment e-mail? (1998)
Limit to Field Length in DB (1998)
State Coalition Approves Internet Sales Tax Plan (2002)
Can you do this??? and other stuff (1997)
SSL and reg web* (1997)
OFF TOPIC: help wanted (1997)
2.0 Beta (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)
What am I missing (1997)
PCS Emailer's role ? (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)
formvariable funkyness (2000)
[date] formatting bug inside [orderfile]? (1998)
Re:Emailer and encryption (1997)
creator code (1997)
WebCatalog2 for NT Beta Request (1997)