Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42419
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks all....as soon as I got on the road to go home that lightbulb went off and said suffix mapping. I'm going to play with the idea of renaming the .js files to something that is mapped and/or using an [include] and/or just putting the code on the individual pages.You're right Alain, I don't want to remap .js to go to webcat...Thanks again, GKDon¹t forget the [] brackets are allowed in .js files .. You are better off just including the code at the top of the html page ..Getting webcat to process .js files for one page/client will end up breaking others sites ..There is a dark light at the end of this path if you choose to follow it ..> Maybe the .js should be an [include]. Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  2. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (John Peacock 2002)
  3. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Gary Krockover 2002)
  4. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Gary Krockover 2002)
  5. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Alain Russell 2002)
  6. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Jeff Logan 2002)
  7. Re: WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Tim Robinson 2002)
  8. WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (Gary Krockover 2002)
Thanks all....as soon as I got on the road to go home that lightbulb went off and said suffix mapping. I'm going to play with the idea of renaming the .js files to something that is mapped and/or using an [include] and/or just putting the code on the individual pages.You're right Alain, I don't want to remap .js to go to webcat...Thanks again, GKDon¹t forget the [] brackets are allowed in .js files .. You are better off just including the code at the top of the html page ..Getting webcat to process .js files for one page/client will end up breaking others sites ..There is a dark light at the end of this path if you choose to follow it ..> Maybe the .js should be an [include]. Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Gary Krockover

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Creating 404 Not Found pages (1999) [WebDNA] grep again (2010) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) How do I get multiple unique numbers on one template? (2000) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) [ShowNext] feature in 2.0 (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997) info (1997) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) Error Type 3 (1999) (1998) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) RE: Can a database get stomped by simultaneous access? (1997) EIMS Problems (1997) Questions about maximum (1999) pc (1997) Enhanced Master Counter? (1997) Format of Required fields error message (1997) [WebDNA] [OT] hello (2012) WebDNA Speed Test (2006)