Re: Includeform Error

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43882
interpreted = N
texte = Bob Minor wrote: > I think the point he was making was the [/includeform] since there > isn't and includeform context tag. Normally your error would be that it > found [/founditems] or [/formvariables] instead, but not an [/includeform] > There _is_ an [/includeform] context, just not one that you can see. Grant explained long ago that the [include] context creates an implied tag as part of the parsing process. This is why you cannot start a WebDNA tag in the main document and complete it in an [include] file, or start in the [include] file and continue in the main template.There is some very rare condition that is causing problems within that [include] file.HTHJohn-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Includeform Error (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  2. Re: Includeform Error (John Peacock 2002)
  3. Re: Includeform Error (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  4. Re: Includeform Error (Bob Minor 2002)
  5. Re: Includeform Error (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  6. Re: Includeform Error (Inkblot Media 2002)
  7. Re: Includeform Error (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  8. Re: Includeform Error (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  9. Includeform Error (Glenn Busbin 2002)
Bob Minor wrote: > I think the point he was making was the [/includeform] since there > isn't and includeform context tag. Normally your error would be that it > found [/founditems] or [/formvariables] instead, but not an [/includeform] > There _is_ an [/includeform] context, just not one that you can see. Grant explained long ago that the [include] context creates an implied tag as part of the parsing process. This is why you cannot start a WebDNA tag in the main document and complete it in an [include] file, or start in the [include] file and continue in the main template.There is some very rare condition that is causing problems within that [include] file.HTHJohn-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Getting Values into Cart the easy way?* (1998) date display (1999) Include a big block of text (1997) tcpconnect timeout with Authorizenet (2003) [WebDNA] Need to convert unix date? (2009) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) when to use SQL over webcat? (2000) Comments in db? (1997) test please ignore (1999) [WebDNA] Duplicate emails (2008) Re[3]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Searchable WebCat (etc.) Docs ? (1997) TRAINING videos - Prove IT. (1998) FORMS: Returning a specific page (1997) Where is f2? (1997) Cart problem (1999) New Command prefs ... (1997) WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997) OT: Site Test (2006) [delete] problem (1997)