Re: Includeform Error

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43882
interpreted = N
texte = Bob Minor wrote: > I think the point he was making was the [/includeform] since there > isn't and includeform context tag. Normally your error would be that it > found [/founditems] or [/formvariables] instead, but not an [/includeform] > There _is_ an [/includeform] context, just not one that you can see. Grant explained long ago that the [include] context creates an implied tag as part of the parsing process. This is why you cannot start a WebDNA tag in the main document and complete it in an [include] file, or start in the [include] file and continue in the main template.There is some very rare condition that is causing problems within that [include] file.HTHJohn-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Includeform Error (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  2. Re: Includeform Error (John Peacock 2002)
  3. Re: Includeform Error (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  4. Re: Includeform Error (Bob Minor 2002)
  5. Re: Includeform Error (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  6. Re: Includeform Error (Inkblot Media 2002)
  7. Re: Includeform Error (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  8. Re: Includeform Error (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  9. Includeform Error (Glenn Busbin 2002)
Bob Minor wrote: > I think the point he was making was the [/includeform] since there > isn't and includeform context tag. Normally your error would be that it > found [/founditems] or [/formvariables] instead, but not an [/includeform] > There _is_ an [/includeform] context, just not one that you can see. Grant explained long ago that the [include] context creates an implied tag as part of the parsing process. This is why you cannot start a WebDNA tag in the main document and complete it in an [include] file, or start in the [include] file and continue in the main template.There is some very rare condition that is causing problems within that [include] file.HTHJohn-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Closing databases (2003) WebCat2b12plugin - [search] is broken ... not! (1997) Problem during evaluation of WebCatalog (1998) Multiple cart additions (1997) Too many webcat comments. [WAS- Large founditems loops] (2000) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) Showing specific [cart] contents (1998) too many nested tags ... (1997) Fun with Dates - revisited (again) (1997) Include vs. lookup? (1998) foreign languages, email, webcat (1998) Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997) can WC render sites out? (1997) Weird [blank] interpretation (1999) [referrer] tag (1997) Image maps/Webcat (1997) Template Cache problem (2000) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) problems with WebCat-Plugin () Moment of Thanks (1997)