Re: Properly coded search fails ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 46589
interpreted = N
texte = Ken:You don't need the three paragraphs of venom at the end of this message - at least wait until you see if you just made a mistake. The search you document below is flawed (ie doesn't follow the WebCat, er, WebDNA docs). Try[search db=xxx.db&group1field=expensePayVia&wogroup1datarq=check]instead.John.>This search fails: > >[search db=xxx.db&group1field=expensePayVia&wogroup1fielddatarq=check] > >... but this one works: > >[search db=xxx.db&woexpensePayViadatarq=check] > >Why isn't this flaw documented? > >There's nothing in the docs to suggest that a search requires at least one 'real' field name in order to work properly, but that's what this test suggests (or seems to indicate). If that's not it, then something else is going on here, and whatever it is, there's no documentation to explain it. > >SMSI, do you intend to make searches work properly when there are only groupXfield names -- and no 'real' field names -- in the search parameters??? > >If not, will you please put this information into the docs -- so they properly explain the fact that using the group field technique will FAIL unless you also use at least one 'real' field name in your search? > >Thanks. > > >Sincerely, >Kenneth Grome > >--------------------------------------------------- >WebDNA Professional Training and Development Center >175 J. Llorente Street +63 (32) 255-6921 >Cebu City, Cebu 6000 kengrome@webdna.net >Philippines http://www.webdna.net >--------------------------------------------------- > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-- --------------------------------- John A. Hill Oak Hill Software Website Development/Consulting john@oakhillsoftware.com------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Properly coded search fails ... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  2. Re: Improperly coded search fails ... (John Hill 2003)
  3. Re: Properly coded search fails ... (John Hill 2003)
  4. Properly coded search fails ... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
Ken:You don't need the three paragraphs of venom at the end of this message - at least wait until you see if you just made a mistake. The search you document below is flawed (ie doesn't follow the WebCat, er, WebDNA docs). Try[search db=xxx.db&group1field=expensePayVia&wogroup1datarq=check]instead.John.>This search fails: > >[search db=xxx.db&group1field=expensePayVia&wogroup1fielddatarq=check] > >... but this one works: > >[search db=xxx.db&woexpensePayViadatarq=check] > >Why isn't this flaw documented? > >There's nothing in the docs to suggest that a search requires at least one 'real' field name in order to work properly, but that's what this test suggests (or seems to indicate). If that's not it, then something else is going on here, and whatever it is, there's no documentation to explain it. > >SMSI, do you intend to make searches work properly when there are only groupXfield names -- and no 'real' field names -- in the search parameters??? > >If not, will you please put this information into the docs -- so they properly explain the fact that using the group field technique will FAIL unless you also use at least one 'real' field name in your search? > >Thanks. > > >Sincerely, >Kenneth Grome > >--------------------------------------------------- >WebDNA Professional Training and Development Center >175 J. Llorente Street +63 (32) 255-6921 >Cebu City, Cebu 6000 kengrome@webdna.net >Philippines http://www.webdna.net >--------------------------------------------------- > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-- --------------------------------- John A. Hill Oak Hill Software Website Development/Consulting john@oakhillsoftware.com------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Hill

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Trouble with formula.db + more explanation (1997) A little help on e-mail (HELP!!! :-) ) (1998) [WebDNA] 3-5 GB of native WebDNA db in RAM?, else MySQL w/WebDNA [SQL] tags, else skip WebDNA altogether? (2009) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) Authorize.net, SIM, tcpconnect and applescript (2003) Setting up WebCatalog with Retail Pro data (1996) Can this be done? (1997) Admin Edit prob. (1997) PCS Frames (1997) MySQL TIME_FORMAT (2005) PIXO (1997) Emailer [cart] file names (1997) Date+time (2004) [table] retained in memory (2006) Who is doing sign-ups-got it (1998) [ShowIf] and empty fields (1997) Re:Emailer setup (1997) AUTHENTICATE TAG Problem (2000) Tool of Use to Unix WebCat Admins (2000) Just Testing (1997)