Re: Sorting nested search
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49029
interpreted = N
texte = WJ Starck wrote:> Thanks, Donovan. > > I need a temp db with 2 fields, ipaddress and frequency. > > How do I create this?> > > I thought of using [writefile], but the docs say the name should not be > a database that WebDNA currently has open. So do I have to have a > [closedatabase] tag in my template after the results are displayed?I have found that using those db utilities are a good idea.. ie [exclusivelock] [/exlusivelock] [commitdatabase] but more for the purpose of ensurement.I guess I haven't heard about the not creating a file with the same name as an open database... Do you need it to be a same name?At any rate, I needed a procrastination tangent so I made up a sample. http://216.81.241.229/tests/samedb_nested/index.htmlOthers might know faster (less CPU intesive) solutions??One possible problem I see with your setup is the use of IPADDRESS as a field name. I tend to use naming that has no way of conflicting with WebDNA's reserved words. (ala [ipaddress])Donovan ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
WJ Starck wrote:> Thanks, Donovan. > > I need a temp db with 2 fields, ipaddress and frequency. > > How do I create this?> > > I thought of using [writefile], but the docs say the name should not be > a database that WebDNA currently has open. So do I have to have a > [closedatabase] tag in my template after the results are displayed?I have found that using those db utilities are a good idea.. ie [exclusivelock] [/exlusivelock] [commitdatabase] but more for the purpose of ensurement.I guess I haven't heard about the not creating a file with the same name as an open database... Do you need it to be a same name?At any rate, I needed a procrastination tangent so I made up a sample. http://216.81.241.229/tests/samedb_nested/index.htmlOthers might know faster (less CPU intesive) solutions??One possible problem I see with your setup is the use of IPADDRESS as a field name. I tend to use naming that has no way of conflicting with WebDNA's reserved words. (ala [ipaddress])Donovan ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Donovan home EHG
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
shownext & math (1997)
show all problem (1997)
emailer 150 (1997)
suggestion (1997)
[ReturnRaw] and hiding FORM data (2003)
Upgrading old WebCat Database Files (1997)
Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997)
Mac OSX 10.5 with WebSTAR... Webcatalog won't run (2003)
Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997)
turning every 5th line red (1999)
UPS Shipping Formula in WebCat (ot) (1999)
WebDNA-Talk Digest mode broken (1997)
Bad cookie (1998)
The beginning (1997)
Emailer Problem (1999)
Multiple Items (2004)
several people editing a database. (2001)
Fwd: Emailer & IMail List Server (1998)
b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997)
Local redirects ... (2005)