Re: Interesting speed comparison ..

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 54373
interpreted = N
texte = On Nov 21, 2003, at 8:59 AM, devaulw@onebox.com wrote: > That looks right, but the real question is why is PHP performing so > much quicker on the new platform? (Do we know what the speed > comparison is for older platforms like G4?) > PHP being open source can be compilied with lots of optimizations. > Has the version of PHP been optimized for G5? What compiliers are > being used? > I don't remember if the test indicated, but what version of PHP was > being used? Was it bundled by in OS X? Not just the new platform. P4 2.4 ghz running RH 7.2: http://blueboxdev.com/php_speed.php167 total ticks http://blueboxdev.com/webdna_speed.html299 total ticks Interesting... -- Jesse Williams-Proudman Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions +1.206.778.8777 :: jesse@blueboxdev.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  3. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  4. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  6. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  7. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Bob Minor 2003)
  8. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  9. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  10. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  11. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  12. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  13. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  14. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  15. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  16. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  17. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  19. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  20. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Alain Russell 2003)
  21. [OT] Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  22. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  23. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  24. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  25. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  26. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  27. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  28. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  29. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  30. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  31. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  32. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  33. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  34. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( devaulw@onebox.com 2003)
  35. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  36. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  37. Interesting speed comparison .. ( Alain Russell 2003)
On Nov 21, 2003, at 8:59 AM, devaulw@onebox.com wrote: > That looks right, but the real question is why is PHP performing so > much quicker on the new platform? (Do we know what the speed > comparison is for older platforms like G4?) > PHP being open source can be compilied with lots of optimizations. > Has the version of PHP been optimized for G5? What compiliers are > being used? > I don't remember if the test indicated, but what version of PHP was > being used? Was it bundled by in OS X? Not just the new platform. P4 2.4 ghz running RH 7.2: http://blueboxdev.com/php_speed.php167 total ticks http://blueboxdev.com/webdna_speed.html299 total ticks Interesting... -- Jesse Williams-Proudman Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions +1.206.778.8777 :: jesse@blueboxdev.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Next X hits (1996) WebCat templates for TyphoonPro admin (1999) [WebDNA] v6.2 dependencies? (2010) Nested tags count question (1997) searchable list archive (1997) NT Setup (1998) OLD ORDERS (1998) Re[2]: Date Time Oddness (1999) Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997) WebDNA-Talk Digests (1997) Don't know if this is a sily question... (2003) Authenticate (1997) TIP OF THE DAY quick & dirty html text (2004) Sort Order on a page search (1997) eAuthorize experience ... ? (2002) [cart] clarification... (1997) Need relative path explanation (1997) using listfiles to build a database? (2000) [WriteFile] problems (1997) Emailer error 571 (1998)