Re: Interesting speed comparison ..

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 54416
interpreted = N
texte = Um, I have this page somewhere that didn't exist but kept looking for a file called 'error.html' which didn't exist either... do recursive 404 loops of death pages count for the contest? ;) -Dan On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:41:25 +1300 "Andrew Simpson" wrote: >Okay guys, this is getting out of hand. I will put my hand up and volunteer to re-write a chunk >of webdna in php. and while i am absolutely no expert in PhP i think i will make a passable >effort at it. > >so, do any of you guys have a page or two that takes a while to process? lets say, you have a >page that does a mass database update or some serious file system work... or maybe just a page >full of logic that calculates some pretty heavy mathematical stuff... > >anything taking more than 100 or so ticks would be something to look at. > >I'll set it up with PhP and MySQL and try and beat the time. then we can establish if there is >really any major difference between the two or if, in fact, we are just arguing for the sake of >hearing ourselves speak. > >anybody? > > >> >>>Having examined the PHP and WebDNA test code, I made the following changes: >> >>>[snip] >> >>>With those few changes, the test results are much more favorable for WebDNA. >> > >> >>Now I think we need someone to volunteer to "make a few changes" to >> >>the PHP code in an effort to speed up PHP's results. If it's fair >> >>for Scott to do this to make webdna perform faster than the first >> >>results, then it is also fair for an expert PHP programmer to do >> >>some code optimizing in PHP, right? >> > >> >Hmm, I guess I didn't see Scott's changes as "optimizing" but rather >> >trying to compare Apples to Apples. >> >> Maybe that's what he did. >> >> >> >> >>If you're only interested in which software can perform the fastest >> >>in the real world, you might try doing a real world test. >> >>Obviously a test that does things that seldom happen in the real >> >>world is not going to be an accurate comparison because the >> >>'contrived' test procedures will always favor one software over >> >>another. Change the contrived procedures and you've reversed the >> >>test results! >> > >> >Well, the problem with "real world" tests are that you can hardly *see* the >> >difference. >> >> Which means this discussion is really a waste of time, because if a >> visitor in the real world cannot see or feel any difference then why >> should we care which one is faster, right? >> >> -- >> >> Sincerely, >> Kenneth Grome >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less! >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com http://www.SearchBoise.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  3. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  4. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  5. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  6. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  7. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Bob Minor 2003)
  8. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  9. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  10. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  11. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  12. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  13. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  14. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  15. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Kenneth Grome 2003)
  16. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  17. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  19. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  20. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Alain Russell 2003)
  21. [OT] Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  22. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  23. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  24. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Scott Anderson" 2003)
  25. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Andrew Simpson" 2003)
  26. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  27. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  28. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  29. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  30. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  31. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  32. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  33. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  34. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( devaulw@onebox.com 2003)
  35. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  36. Re: Interesting speed comparison .. ( Marc Kaiwi 2003)
  37. Interesting speed comparison .. ( Alain Russell 2003)
Um, I have this page somewhere that didn't exist but kept looking for a file called 'error.html' which didn't exist either... do recursive 404 loops of death pages count for the contest? ;) -Dan On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:41:25 +1300 "Andrew Simpson" wrote: >Okay guys, this is getting out of hand. I will put my hand up and volunteer to re-write a chunk >of webdna in php. and while i am absolutely no expert in PhP i think i will make a passable >effort at it. > >so, do any of you guys have a page or two that takes a while to process? lets say, you have a >page that does a mass database update or some serious file system work... or maybe just a page >full of logic that calculates some pretty heavy mathematical stuff... > >anything taking more than 100 or so ticks would be something to look at. > >I'll set it up with PhP and MySQL and try and beat the time. then we can establish if there is >really any major difference between the two or if, in fact, we are just arguing for the sake of >hearing ourselves speak. > >anybody? > > >> >>>Having examined the PHP and WebDNA test code, I made the following changes: >> >>>[snip] >> >>>With those few changes, the test results are much more favorable for WebDNA. >> > >> >>Now I think we need someone to volunteer to "make a few changes" to >> >>the PHP code in an effort to speed up PHP's results. If it's fair >> >>for Scott to do this to make webdna perform faster than the first >> >>results, then it is also fair for an expert PHP programmer to do >> >>some code optimizing in PHP, right? >> > >> >Hmm, I guess I didn't see Scott's changes as "optimizing" but rather >> >trying to compare Apples to Apples. >> >> Maybe that's what he did. >> >> >> >> >>If you're only interested in which software can perform the fastest >> >>in the real world, you might try doing a real world test. >> >>Obviously a test that does things that seldom happen in the real >> >>world is not going to be an accurate comparison because the >> >>'contrived' test procedures will always favor one software over >> >>another. Change the contrived procedures and you've reversed the >> >>test results! >> > >> >Well, the problem with "real world" tests are that you can hardly *see* the >> >difference. >> >> Which means this discussion is really a waste of time, because if a >> visitor in the real world cannot see or feel any difference then why >> should we care which one is faster, right? >> >> -- >> >> Sincerely, >> Kenneth Grome >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less! >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com http://www.SearchBoise.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Dan Strong"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997) Sendmail doesn't (was Queertrons?) (1997) Math Help (2000) emailer settings and control questions (1997) Displaying photo attached to first record (1997) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) Fedora Core 6 (2007) Error -108 (1997) Multiple fields on 1 input (1997) Odd request (2003) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) notification solutions (1997) Error (1997) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) WebCat2: Formulas.db question (1997) Summing fields (1997) Re:quit command on NT (1997) GuestBook example (1997) Interfacing WebMerchant to www.fedex.com (1997) insecuretextvars preference doesn't work (2000)