Re: Interesting speed comparison ..
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 54388
interpreted = N
texte = Mox Nix to me man! All I know (the simple test) is that when I request the test pages it consistently takes about a second or so longer to retrieve the WD test page. So, to me the difference is small and nothing to worry about. On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Andrew Simpson wrote: > Okay guys, remember, the "WebDNA Speed Test" was originally developed > to test Hardware, not Software and hence does not actually do anything > useful that you would really find in day to day coding, it just > hammers the CPU, RAM and Harddrive. > > What would probably be more indicative of the differences and > variations of WebCat versus another technology would be to take a Page > or group of pages that do some serious, real life processing and > re-write them in php, then hold the magnifying glass up to both of > them and analyze them properly. > > and not just for speed either but for: > > Processing Speed, > Development Time, > Scalability, > Knowledge and Skill required to develop (both in the coding and in the > supporting infrastructure) > > Then take into account things like how re-useable and re-saleable your > solution is, how much support there is out there for it etc. > > Then you find yourself with actually usefull answers. Signed: Marc Kaiwi ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Mox Nix to me man! All I know (the simple test) is that when I request the test pages it consistently takes about a second or so longer to retrieve the WD test page. So, to me the difference is small and nothing to worry about. On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Andrew Simpson wrote: > Okay guys, remember, the "WebDNA Speed Test" was originally developed > to test Hardware, not Software and hence does not actually do anything > useful that you would really find in day to day coding, it just > hammers the CPU, RAM and Harddrive. > > What would probably be more indicative of the differences and > variations of WebCat versus another technology would be to take a Page > or group of pages that do some serious, real life processing and > re-write them in php, then hold the magnifying glass up to both of > them and analyze them properly. > > and not just for speed either but for: > > Processing Speed, > Development Time, > Scalability, > Knowledge and Skill required to develop (both in the coding and in the > supporting infrastructure) > > Then take into account things like how re-useable and re-saleable your > solution is, how much support there is out there for it etc. > > Then you find yourself with actually usefull answers. Signed: Marc Kaiwi ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Marc Kaiwi
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WC2b15 File Corruption (1997)
Re[2]: searches with dash, period etc. (back form politenes (2000)
WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems SOLVED! (1997)
Putting Foundvariables within search. (2000)
Post size Limit? (1998)
Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Quitting WebMerchant ? (1997)
Searching for all records (1998)
Upload Progress Bar [OT] (2003)
The List is Changing (1997)
Netscape 3.01 can't see db in form (was problems problemsproblems) (1997)
OT Flash Stores (2003)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997)
Document Contains No Data msg (1997)
local IIS setup (2004)
RE: [WebDNA] Fwd: RETS... HELP! (2009)
[Sum] function? (1997)
can WC render sites out? (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)