Re: Yet another db manager
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 55550
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Bill,Okay, the restriction on which row that must contain the unique value has been removed. Per default it is row #1, but the user can change this to ANY row. A row which has been selected as carrying the unique values is now being indicated by vertical color-coding. Is this a good enough solution?I will continue working on the template but I will probably not release any new versions until I get some more feedback. And since this is day 1 (T=0) there is plenty of time for that.Anyway, I think it could be fun to produce an Open Source Admin Tool for all of us to use (if interested). If the interest is not mutural - well, then I just develop the functionality I need and no hard feelings.The most recent version has been uploaded with a lot of enhancements, new functionality and optimization (and a couple of smaller bug fixes too) hope you like ...:http://www.powerpalle.dk/digger_v05.tpl.zipPalleOn 18/1-2004, at 18.43, devaulw@onebox.com wrote:> Since you are open sourcing this, can we all make suggestions? I'd > remove the restriction on which row must contain the unique value for > each record.> I've also tried to create (never finished though) my own database > manager to create pages that can users can access. Perhaps some of > that code or at least logic can be contributed to this.> Perhaps a myPHPadmin subset would work well for most WebDNA developers.> Bill>> -----Original Message-----> From: Gary Krockover
> Sent: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:21:29 -0600> To: (WebDNA Talk)> Subject: Re: Yet another db manager>> For larger databases, yeah, I would think that would be a highly > desirable feature (if not needed). Optimally, you could have it sort > by up to 3 (or more?) fields, or, if you incorporate my query builder, > the user could enter a search string to see the results desired, and > then have the option to modify a record. And if you wanted to go a > step further, give it the option of being able to modify all visible > records at once. I have working code for that part of it if you need.>> GK>> At 10:44 AM 1/18/2004, you wrote:>> Hi Gary,>>>> Will it make a difference if you are able to choose the fieldtype? In >> other words, should it be a requirement within the functionality of >> the Digger template?>>>> PS. New version ready online with some new features and optimized >> code...:>>>> http://www.powerpalle.dk/diggerv3.tpl.zip>>>> Palle>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>--Venlig hilsenPalle B. Nielsen (PowerPalle)http://www.macnyt.dk/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi Bill,Okay, the restriction on which row that must contain the unique value has been removed. Per default it is row #1, but the user can change this to ANY row. A row which has been selected as carrying the unique values is now being indicated by vertical color-coding. Is this a good enough solution?I will continue working on the template but I will probably not release any new versions until I get some more feedback. And since this is day 1 (T=0) there is plenty of time for that.Anyway, I think it could be fun to produce an Open Source Admin Tool for all of us to use (if interested). If the interest is not mutural - well, then I just develop the functionality I need and no hard feelings.The most recent version has been uploaded with a lot of enhancements, new functionality and optimization (and a couple of smaller bug fixes too) hope you like ...:http://www.powerpalle.dk/digger_v05.tpl.zipPalleOn 18/1-2004, at 18.43, devaulw@onebox.com wrote:> Since you are open sourcing this, can we all make suggestions? I'd > remove the restriction on which row must contain the unique value for > each record.> I've also tried to create (never finished though) my own database > manager to create pages that can users can access. Perhaps some of > that code or at least logic can be contributed to this.> Perhaps a myPHPadmin subset would work well for most WebDNA developers.> Bill>> -----Original Message-----> From: Gary Krockover > Sent: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:21:29 -0600> To: (WebDNA Talk)> Subject: Re: Yet another db manager>> For larger databases, yeah, I would think that would be a highly > desirable feature (if not needed). Optimally, you could have it sort > by up to 3 (or more?) fields, or, if you incorporate my query builder, > the user could enter a search string to see the results desired, and > then have the option to modify a record. And if you wanted to go a > step further, give it the option of being able to modify all visible > records at once. I have working code for that part of it if you need.>> GK>> At 10:44 AM 1/18/2004, you wrote:>> Hi Gary,>>>> Will it make a difference if you are able to choose the fieldtype? In >> other words, should it be a requirement within the functionality of >> the Digger template?>>>> PS. New version ready online with some new features and optimized >> code...:>>>> http://www.powerpalle.dk/diggerv3.tpl.zip>>>> Palle>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>--Venlig hilsenPalle B. Nielsen (PowerPalle)http://www.macnyt.dk/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Palle Bo Nielsen
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997)
unsubscribe (2000)
WebCatalog 4.0 ? (2000)
PCS Customer submissions ? (1997)
Using [Include] Context (1999)
RE: Writefile outside WebSTAR hierarchy? (1997)
Can't load tmpl files (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
Date comparison (I think) has bugs ... (1998)
Fun with dates (1997)
item sorting (1997)
Emailer (1997)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
Version f1 status (1997)
Windows 95/NT tip of the month (1998)
Duplicate emails being sent - only since last night (2002)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
I'm tired of all this! (2000)
[WebDNA] Press Release (2008)
Date search bug (1998)