Re: Undeclared variables
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 57487
interpreted = N
texte = Yes but what's the point of avoiding them? They don't require any appreciable overhead and they make coding much easier, right?>But then you have insecure variables :(>>On Apr 23, 2004, at 9:23 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>>>Is there a more elegant way to do this:>>>>>>[showif [variable]=[raw][variable][/raw]]variable=some default >>>value[/showif]>>>>>>Seems like using [raw] is a pretty kludgey way of determining if a >>>variable is undefined. I've been doing this forever, and maybe in >>>ver 6 there's a better way now?>>>>>>There is a better way (in my opinion) and it's been around for >>ages, you do not need v6, but it DOES require that you declare all >>the vars you might be checking for at the TOP of the page like this:>>>>[text secure=f]var1=[/text]>>[text secure=f]var2=[/text]>>[text secure=f]var3=[/text]>>>>... or like this:>>>>[text secure=f&multi=T]var1=&var2=&var3=[/text]>>>>This pre-sets them all to insecure variables with blank values. >>Then you can just put the [var1] tag on the page and it will >>resolve to blank or else it will resolve to whatever value it gets >>reset to AFTER you preset it to blank at the top of the page.>>>>In other words, if the value is reset by an incoming formvariable >>or by some webdna code in the page itself, it will resolve to that >>new value. But if the value is not reset it will remain blank, >>which means it is easy to check using showif's WITHOUT messing with >>raw or url contexts.>>>>If you still need to check it first to see if it's blank before >>using it, this is the easy-coding way to do it without raw or url:>>>>[showif =[var1]]the value is blank[/showif]>>>>[showif ![var1]]the value is not blank[/showif]>>>>This works because the comparison value on the left side of the >>operator is blank, and the next char is the comparison operator, so >>everything that follows is either blank or not. And since webdna >>has already identified the comparison operator before it gets to >>the var1 tag, you do not have to URL it like you would if you did >>it like this instead:>>>>[showif [url][var1][/url]=]the value is blank[/showif]>>>>If you take advantage of this feature, you can write code faster >>that still works as expected without introducing any problems. I >>have been pre-setting my vars like this for years and it just works >>...>>>>-->>>>Kenneth Grome>>WebDNA Programmer>>Outsource Service Provider>>Phone: +6332 255-6591>>>>------------------------------------------------------------->>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list
.>>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>>>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------->This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-- Kenneth GromeWebDNA ProgrammerOutsource Service ProviderPhone: +6332 255-6591-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Yes but what's the point of avoiding them? They don't require any appreciable overhead and they make coding much easier, right?>But then you have insecure variables :(>>On Apr 23, 2004, at 9:23 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>>>Is there a more elegant way to do this:>>>>>>[showif [variable]=[raw][variable][/raw]]variable=some default >>>value[/showif]>>>>>>Seems like using [raw] is a pretty kludgey way of determining if a >>>variable is undefined. I've been doing this forever, and maybe in >>>ver 6 there's a better way now?>>>>>>There is a better way (in my opinion) and it's been around for >>ages, you do not need v6, but it DOES require that you declare all >>the vars you might be checking for at the TOP of the page like this:>>>>[text secure=f]var1=[/text]>>[text secure=f]var2=[/text]>>[text secure=f]var3=[/text]>>>>... or like this:>>>>[text secure=f&multi=T]var1=&var2=&var3=[/text]>>>>This pre-sets them all to insecure variables with blank values. >>Then you can just put the [var1] tag on the page and it will >>resolve to blank or else it will resolve to whatever value it gets >>reset to AFTER you preset it to blank at the top of the page.>>>>In other words, if the value is reset by an incoming formvariable >>or by some webdna code in the page itself, it will resolve to that >>new value. But if the value is not reset it will remain blank, >>which means it is easy to check using showif's WITHOUT messing with >>raw or url contexts.>>>>If you still need to check it first to see if it's blank before >>using it, this is the easy-coding way to do it without raw or url:>>>>[showif =[var1]]the value is blank[/showif]>>>>[showif ![var1]]the value is not blank[/showif]>>>>This works because the comparison value on the left side of the >>operator is blank, and the next char is the comparison operator, so >>everything that follows is either blank or not. And since webdna >>has already identified the comparison operator before it gets to >>the var1 tag, you do not have to URL it like you would if you did >>it like this instead:>>>>[showif [url][var1][/url]=]the value is blank[/showif]>>>>If you take advantage of this feature, you can write code faster >>that still works as expected without introducing any problems. I >>have been pre-setting my vars like this for years and it just works >>...>>>>-->>>>Kenneth Grome>>WebDNA Programmer>>Outsource Service Provider>>Phone: +6332 255-6591>>>>------------------------------------------------------------->>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>>>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------->This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-- Kenneth GromeWebDNA ProgrammerOutsource Service ProviderPhone: +6332 255-6591-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Explorer 3.0/ Access Denied! (1997)
[WebDNA] Advices for Linux Config (2017)
Oops, Sorry for the cluttter ... Looking for WebCatdeveloper/contractor (2000)
Setting up shop (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
WebCatalog-NT?'s (1996)
[listfiles] problems (1997)
[SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997)
HideIf ip= OR ip (1998)
Re2: frames & carts (1997)
with Link i need to (1997)
select multiple (1997)
There is a bug in 3.0.1 mac plug-in (1998)
wc 2 pro users - sites, quotes wanted (1997)
New servers and new inline cache (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997)
Multiple Merchant Accounts? (1997)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
Quiestion (1997)
Parameter Passing (2000)