Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2006
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66808
interpreted = N
texte = May be you can go into detail about advantages of frameworks. Why =frameworks can offer something that RIA can't.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Ofnitai@computeroil.comSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:05 PMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)But Rubyonrails or Fusebox or alike are frameworks that make you work in =a certain way and are suppossed to make your code more streamlined.OpenLazlo/Flex/Ajax are tools to create Rich Internet Applications that =behave the same like a Desktop application. Mostly they are tight to XML =syntax and can interact with a middleware which connects to a database.I have had (and still are) expiriencing with Flex, but like I said it is =for creating RIA.Nitai--eContentPark - Enterprise Asset Management SystemeServices - The complete SupportSuiteeSurvey - Online Questionnaire made easyRedakto CMS - Content Management that simply worksComputerOil=AE AGNeugutstrasse 668600 D=FCbendorf / SwitzerlandTelefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66info@computeroil.comhttp://computeroil.comFrom: Bess Ho [mailto:BessH@USMS.com]To: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]Sent: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:51:33 +0200Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)You are right. Rudyonrails looks pretty good. I am exploring =OpenLaszlo.org that allows plug-n-play AJAX or Flash. It may be even =faster to deliver the functionality.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Ofdevaulw@onebox.comSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:30 AMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)Using, no. Experimenting, yes. I think John also said he was looking =into it.=20I never cared for PHP since that was just another scripting language. =PHP and WebDNA are the same from that perspective. Ruby on Rails is =different though.=20One issue with Ruby on Rails is that one needs to know/learn Ruby (a =language) and then learn Rails (a framework). Ruby is an object oriented =language -- this is conceptually different from scripting languages in =many respects.=20Rails is a framework. It basically sets up convenient places to put =parts of your web application and gives a number of tools that tie the =application to a database and provide some very useful built-in methods =that make creating applications simple and adding features very, very =easy. It strives to prevent code duplication (write once, use everywhere =in your app -- they call it DRY for don't repeat yourself).=20The real kicker is that Rails makes it unbelievably easy to add lots of =nice AJAX type functionality.=20Given that Rails is a framework, others are using it as a model to =create frameworks in PHP, Python and other languages. I haven't seen any =effort in WebDNA on this front to build a framework other than =storebuilder and that is more of a generator than a framework that would =work for any application.=20I was drawn to Rails when I saw some of the screencasts that showed how =easy it was to create a blog for example. That was something that people =on the WebDNA list had talked about putting together as an OS project. =With Rails, a basic blog can be done in about fifteen minutes (assuming =you've invested in the learning curve).Bill-----Original Message-----From: Clint Davis
Sent: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 09:11:24 -0500To: "WebDNA Talk" Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)As a sidenote...Is anyone on the list using Ruby on Rails? I don't have any experience =withit, but it's potential is very attractive.On 4/6/06 9:04 AM, "devaulw@onebox.com" wrote:> Back on the data structure, I just read last night about the ="acts_as_tree"> model method in Rails. That seems like it would work really well to =handle the> self-referential tree structure originally set out. Of course, you'd =have to> be using Rails first.=20-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
May be you can go into detail about advantages of frameworks. Why =frameworks can offer something that RIA can't.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Ofnitai@computeroil.comSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:05 PMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)But Rubyonrails or Fusebox or alike are frameworks that make you work in =a certain way and are suppossed to make your code more streamlined.OpenLazlo/Flex/Ajax are tools to create Rich Internet Applications that =behave the same like a Desktop application. Mostly they are tight to XML =syntax and can interact with a middleware which connects to a database.I have had (and still are) expiriencing with Flex, but like I said it is =for creating RIA.Nitai--eContentPark - Enterprise Asset Management SystemeServices - The complete SupportSuiteeSurvey - Online Questionnaire made easyRedakto CMS - Content Management that simply worksComputerOil=AE AGNeugutstrasse 668600 D=FCbendorf / SwitzerlandTelefon +41 (0)844 44 55 66info@computeroil.comhttp://computeroil.comFrom: Bess Ho [mailto:BessH@USMS.com]To: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]Sent: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:51:33 +0200Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)You are right. Rudyonrails looks pretty good. I am exploring =OpenLaszlo.org that allows plug-n-play AJAX or Flash. It may be even =faster to deliver the functionality.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Ofdevaulw@onebox.comSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:30 AMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)Using, no. Experimenting, yes. I think John also said he was looking =into it.=20I never cared for PHP since that was just another scripting language. =PHP and WebDNA are the same from that perspective. Ruby on Rails is =different though.=20One issue with Ruby on Rails is that one needs to know/learn Ruby (a =language) and then learn Rails (a framework). Ruby is an object oriented =language -- this is conceptually different from scripting languages in =many respects.=20Rails is a framework. It basically sets up convenient places to put =parts of your web application and gives a number of tools that tie the =application to a database and provide some very useful built-in methods =that make creating applications simple and adding features very, very =easy. It strives to prevent code duplication (write once, use everywhere =in your app -- they call it DRY for don't repeat yourself).=20The real kicker is that Rails makes it unbelievably easy to add lots of =nice AJAX type functionality.=20Given that Rails is a framework, others are using it as a model to =create frameworks in PHP, Python and other languages. I haven't seen any =effort in WebDNA on this front to build a framework other than =storebuilder and that is more of a generator than a framework that would =work for any application.=20I was drawn to Rails when I saw some of the screencasts that showed how =easy it was to create a blog for example. That was something that people =on the WebDNA list had talked about putting together as an OS project. =With Rails, a basic blog can be done in about fifteen minutes (assuming =you've invested in the learning curve).Bill-----Original Message-----From: Clint Davis Sent: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 09:11:24 -0500To: "WebDNA Talk" Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)As a sidenote...Is anyone on the list using Ruby on Rails? I don't have any experience =withit, but it's potential is very attractive.On 4/6/06 9:04 AM, "devaulw@onebox.com" wrote:> Back on the data structure, I just read last night about the ="acts_as_tree"> model method in Rails. That seems like it would work really well to =handle the> self-referential tree structure originally set out. Of course, you'd =have to> be using Rails first.=20-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
"Bess Ho"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Numbers from Sentence (2003)
[searchString] (1997)
Thanks ! (1997)
Applescript, WebDNA, and PDF (1997)
Reversed words (1997)
Can this be done? (1997)
Problem using # in my field names ... (1998)
WebDNA-Talk Digest mode broken (1997)
PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997)
French characters in variables (2001)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
[isfile] ? (1997)
Misc Stuff That Might Help (1997)
Credit Card processing (1998)
Append File help needed (2000)
Mac v. NT (1998)
Sandbox DB permissions (2005)
F3 crashing server (1997)
Credit card types (1997)
Multiple results (2001)