Re: Interactive Docs
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2007
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 68765
interpreted = N
texte = I'm getting a bit off topic here but... Donovan Brooke wrote: > Frank, there is nothing in the spam that links back to any server. I know. One really strange thing about the spam flood that's been pestering forums all over the web the last year or so, is that there doesn't seem to be any genuine links anywhere in it. So apparently whoever is behind it, isn't doing it for money. It all seems to either be just a sick joke or they're still testing out the network - but neither of these options makes any sense at all. > However, a quick look at the source reveals why it is taking so long. > Each little one piece of spam contains much white space (about 65,000 lines > of it!). Hmmm, I've never noticed that before but then again it's a detail easily overlooked. > I guess if SMSI would remove the spam and implement an approval > feature (as I have suggested to them about a year or two ago) the docs > wouldn't have that problem. Let's look at the positive side: Perhaps this'll force SMSI to start taking WebDNA seriously again? ;-) Frank ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I'm getting a bit off topic here but... Donovan Brooke wrote: > Frank, there is nothing in the spam that links back to any server. I know. One really strange thing about the spam flood that's been pestering forums all over the web the last year or so, is that there doesn't seem to be any genuine links anywhere in it. So apparently whoever is behind it, isn't doing it for money. It all seems to either be just a sick joke or they're still testing out the network - but neither of these options makes any sense at all. > However, a quick look at the source reveals why it is taking so long. > Each little one piece of spam contains much white space (about 65,000 lines > of it!). Hmmm, I've never noticed that before but then again it's a detail easily overlooked. > I guess if SMSI would remove the spam and implement an approval > feature (as I have suggested to them about a year or two ago) the docs > wouldn't have that problem. Let's look at the positive side: Perhaps this'll force SMSI to start taking WebDNA seriously again? ;-) Frank ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Frank Nordberg
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat 3? (2000)
Large databases in WebCat (1997)
woops - speed results - right subject (2002)
Using [showif] within [lineitems] (2000)
WebCatalog not running after upgrade (2000)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
[Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997)
Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997)
WebCatalog NT beta 18 now available (1997)
Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997)
[OT] Backup/ failsafe strategies (2003)
suffix mapping for NT? (1997)
typhoon... (1997)
Sorting error (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997)
[SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997)
Email within tmpl ? (1997)
WebDelivery Self-Destruct Timer (2000)
[WebDNA] Sorting questions (2009)
WebCatalog as a ListServ (1998)