Re: OT: Backup Strategies

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69263
interpreted = N
texte = We use a drive raid with 8 firewire spots and we rotate out the 8th spot offisite, in addition to a local backup drive and a mirror. Drives are cheap!! On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:40, Clint Davis wrote: > I have a problem with that strategy. Let's say I have a file that > becomes > corrupt, and I don't figure this out until 3 days later. The > version on the > mirror will be corrupt just like the original. No? > > > On 9/11/07 2:32 PM, "Christophe Billiottet" wrote: > >> As far as we are concerned, we want to be able to reboot from the >> backup (OS X only). This is why we do mirror copies using SuperDuper. >> In case of disk failure, we just boot from the backup and this is it! >> extremely reliable. >> >> - chris >> >> >> >> >> On Sep 11, 2007, at 16:05, Clint Davis wrote: >> >>> We're a small ad agency with 15 employees. We have a mix of OS X >>> 10.4 & >>> Windows XP computers. We're currently using a DLT8000 drive with >>> Retrospect >>> 6 and doing a differential backup on all the systems each night. We >>> just use >>> tapes until they're full, and we only reuse tapes every 3 years or >>> so. I >>> want to move to a more efficient, sensible backup strategy like GFS >>> (grandfather-father-son). >>> >>> I'm concerned about data safety in case of fire, but I also need to >>> restore >>> data quickly in case of a drive failure or file deletion. Does the >>> scenario >>> below make sense in this case? >>> >>> * 5 Weekday tapes for incremental backup (Sons - to be rotated >>> weekly) >>> * 3 Saturday tapes for differential backup (Fathers - to be rotated >>> monthly) >>> * 1 Sunday disk for full backup (Grandfather - to be rotated >>> annually) >>> * Only one tape would be kept onsite at a time > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( thierry 2007)
  2. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( Clint Davis 2007)
  3. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( thierry 2007)
  4. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( "Dan Strickler" 2007)
  5. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( "Dan Strickler" 2007)
  7. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( thierry 2007)
  8. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  9. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( Bob Minor 2007)
  10. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( Clint Davis 2007)
  11. Re: OT: Backup Strategies ( Chris 2007)
  12. OT: Backup Strategies ( Clint Davis 2007)
We use a drive raid with 8 firewire spots and we rotate out the 8th spot offisite, in addition to a local backup drive and a mirror. Drives are cheap!! On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:40, Clint Davis wrote: > I have a problem with that strategy. Let's say I have a file that > becomes > corrupt, and I don't figure this out until 3 days later. The > version on the > mirror will be corrupt just like the original. No? > > > On 9/11/07 2:32 PM, "Christophe Billiottet" wrote: > >> As far as we are concerned, we want to be able to reboot from the >> backup (OS X only). This is why we do mirror copies using SuperDuper. >> In case of disk failure, we just boot from the backup and this is it! >> extremely reliable. >> >> - chris >> >> >> >> >> On Sep 11, 2007, at 16:05, Clint Davis wrote: >> >>> We're a small ad agency with 15 employees. We have a mix of OS X >>> 10.4 & >>> Windows XP computers. We're currently using a DLT8000 drive with >>> Retrospect >>> 6 and doing a differential backup on all the systems each night. We >>> just use >>> tapes until they're full, and we only reuse tapes every 3 years or >>> so. I >>> want to move to a more efficient, sensible backup strategy like GFS >>> (grandfather-father-son). >>> >>> I'm concerned about data safety in case of fire, but I also need to >>> restore >>> data quickly in case of a drive failure or file deletion. Does the >>> scenario >>> below make sense in this case? >>> >>> * 5 Weekday tapes for incremental backup (Sons - to be rotated >>> weekly) >>> * 3 Saturday tapes for differential backup (Fathers - to be rotated >>> monthly) >>> * 1 Sunday disk for full backup (Grandfather - to be rotated >>> annually) >>> * Only one tape would be kept onsite at a time > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

webmerchant (2000) authenticating a second user (1997) RE: Languages (1997) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) CGI Request Time Out (1997) Upload Graphic Problem (2004) when is date system date or order date? (1997) extending webcatalog (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) WebDNA EMail Preference (2005) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) docs for WebCatalog2 (1997) Exclamation point (1997) Showif date range comparison (1999) Announcement-WebCatalog 2.0 Released (1997) Ampersand (1997) WebCat2: Master Counter snippet (1997) WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997) Need relative path explanation (1997) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)