Re: OT: SEO

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69539
interpreted = N
texte = A fair rant Donovan .... I agree totally with you, I have found that I have learned a fair bit from them and I always insist that I am at any meeting between the SEO & my clients as often the SEO will want to create the SPAM page that you rightly mention. However I have seen the rankings of clients rise steadily due to their work, the clients have increased sales, I've made a few $$ on the side, the purchaser has been able to find what they want at the right price - everyone seems to be happy - shame the site now looks like crap !! On 05/12/2007, at 10:26 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Stuart Tremain wrote: > >> We use http://www.iprospect.com >> Spent about $150k with them last year, clients are very happy with >> their outcome. > > > Most of which would have been better spent on a programmer.. IMO. > > [rant] > SEO's are, more often than not, a pain (IMNSHO). Sometimes I think > these guys are getting paid more for their "Magic" than any other > accountable service. > > O.K., I will admit that those who are actually reputable (I don't > know that there are that many), will have an edge over your > do it all programmers. However, all to often, I see these companies > getting paid way too much for a service that is not that magical and, > seemingly to me, barely justifiable. > > Am I alone on this? > > Here is a typical scenario for me... A client has me do some > database driven stuff for their website. He also has an SEO > do "stuff" for the website. SEO guy will then hire me to add > meta fields to the products and categories database (or what have > you), and then edit the respective public pages to reflect the > content. The SEO guy will also create a bunch of static pages that > each > contain non-included header info. The client will then change his > mind on the header images etc. I then am hired to change all > the SEO pages to match the new header look and feel. In the > end, my client ends up with a home page that looks like a spam > email... containing suspect links and non-related links etc.. > > The end result is, yes, my client is happy even though he/she > has paid for redundant services (btw, the SEO companies always > get paid double what I do). The client is also happy (most of > the time) because the SEO guy was able to get the site ranked. > The SEO guy is happy of course (he's getting paid twice what I do > for half the skill needed ;-) ), > and I am left with this bitter sweet feeling of; Well, > I got more work out it, and; my client has to pay for > unnecessary things. > > The thing is, I'm usually not in the position to say this stuff > to my client at the time about this and it all seems to work out in > the > end. But, these are the usual feelings I am left with. > > I think there are valid reasons to hire an SEO. If a > company is looking to get things done quickly, spreading > out the workload in this way may help. Also, I suppose there are > a few resources that an SEO would have over your average > do-it-all programmer... such as shared link resources, and > perhaps some of the latest tricks etc.. So in the case, that > an organization wants the very top notch SEO compatibility, a valid > SEO may be a good choice. So no offense to > those valid SEO companies out there. > > I am always striving for fair business regarding the internet. > The internet field is a haven for shady business practices, > and it is my opinion that SEO's are among the top players. > > I say, for most situations, spend your money on a > programmer/designer... it'll go farther for the same or > better results. > [/rant] > > > Donovan > > > > > -- > =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o > DONOVAN D. BROOKE EUCA Design Center > > <- Web Development (specializing in eCommerce),-> > <- Desktop Publishing, Print Consulting, Labels -> > <- Glass Blowing, and Art Glass -> > > PH/FAX:> 1 (608) 770-3822 > Web:> http://www.egg.bz | http://www.euca.us > =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: OT: SEO ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  2. Re: OT: SEO ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  3. Re: OT: SEO ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  4. OT: SEO ( Gary Krockover 2007)
A fair rant Donovan .... I agree totally with you, I have found that I have learned a fair bit from them and I always insist that I am at any meeting between the SEO & my clients as often the SEO will want to create the SPAM page that you rightly mention. However I have seen the rankings of clients rise steadily due to their work, the clients have increased sales, I've made a few $$ on the side, the purchaser has been able to find what they want at the right price - everyone seems to be happy - shame the site now looks like crap !! On 05/12/2007, at 10:26 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Stuart Tremain wrote: > >> We use http://www.iprospect.com >> Spent about $150k with them last year, clients are very happy with >> their outcome. > > > Most of which would have been better spent on a programmer.. IMO. > > [rant] > SEO's are, more often than not, a pain (IMNSHO). Sometimes I think > these guys are getting paid more for their "Magic" than any other > accountable service. > > O.K., I will admit that those who are actually reputable (I don't > know that there are that many), will have an edge over your > do it all programmers. However, all to often, I see these companies > getting paid way too much for a service that is not that magical and, > seemingly to me, barely justifiable. > > Am I alone on this? > > Here is a typical scenario for me... A client has me do some > database driven stuff for their website. He also has an SEO > do "stuff" for the website. SEO guy will then hire me to add > meta fields to the products and categories database (or what have > you), and then edit the respective public pages to reflect the > content. The SEO guy will also create a bunch of static pages that > each > contain non-included header info. The client will then change his > mind on the header images etc. I then am hired to change all > the SEO pages to match the new header look and feel. In the > end, my client ends up with a home page that looks like a spam > email... containing suspect links and non-related links etc.. > > The end result is, yes, my client is happy even though he/she > has paid for redundant services (btw, the SEO companies always > get paid double what I do). The client is also happy (most of > the time) because the SEO guy was able to get the site ranked. > The SEO guy is happy of course (he's getting paid twice what I do > for half the skill needed ;-) ), > and I am left with this bitter sweet feeling of; Well, > I got more work out it, and; my client has to pay for > unnecessary things. > > The thing is, I'm usually not in the position to say this stuff > to my client at the time about this and it all seems to work out in > the > end. But, these are the usual feelings I am left with. > > I think there are valid reasons to hire an SEO. If a > company is looking to get things done quickly, spreading > out the workload in this way may help. Also, I suppose there are > a few resources that an SEO would have over your average > do-it-all programmer... such as shared link resources, and > perhaps some of the latest tricks etc.. So in the case, that > an organization wants the very top notch SEO compatibility, a valid > SEO may be a good choice. So no offense to > those valid SEO companies out there. > > I am always striving for fair business regarding the internet. > The internet field is a haven for shady business practices, > and it is my opinion that SEO's are among the top players. > > I say, for most situations, spend your money on a > programmer/designer... it'll go farther for the same or > better results. > [/rant] > > > Donovan > > > > > -- > =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o > DONOVAN D. BROOKE EUCA Design Center > > <- Web Development (specializing in eCommerce),-> > <- Desktop Publishing, Print Consulting, Labels -> > <- Glass Blowing, and Art Glass -> > > PH/FAX:> 1 (608) 770-3822 > Web:> http://www.egg.bz | http://www.euca.us > =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) 300% usage - Clint (2007) Template Encryption (1998) [NT] ie 4.0 required (1997) Server crash (1997) Navigator 4.0 & tables (1997) Re:WebCatalog/WebMerchant III (1998) Encrypt broken on Mac 3.05b13?? (2000) Sorting by date (1997) Robots fill event log (1997) Backwards list behavior ... (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA version 7 feature list? (2011) RE: Error: template (1997) Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997) Robert Minor duplicate mail (1997) can webcat determine an image's pixel dimensions? (2000) 2.0 Info (1997) WebDNA Solutions ... (1997) WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) Mac -Shareware Listserver (1998)