Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103945
interpreted = N
texte = Sorry, but WebDNA cannot be considered an object-oriented language. Flexible; friendly; easy-to-use, yes: but not object-oriented. The article will lose credibility if that stays in there. On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend > themselves to this idea. I don't have a traditional computer science > background Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Tana Adams 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Brian Fries 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Toby Cox 2009)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  34. [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
Sorry, but WebDNA cannot be considered an object-oriented language. Flexible; friendly; easy-to-use, yes: but not object-oriented. The article will lose credibility if that stays in there. On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend > themselves to this idea. I don't have a traditional computer science > background Grant Hulbert

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

can WC render sites out? (1997) [isfile] ? (1997) [WebDNA] Write uploaded file with same name (2020) Fields/Forms Processing (1998) Detecting/limiting connections in the developer edition ... (2004) [WebDNA] macOS 10.13.3 and WebDNA Mac Server 8.5.1 - hick-up (2019) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) Design Help Needed (1998) Search (1997) Cookies not setting on IE (2002) autocommit problem (1998) I found a bug ... (1997) RE: protect tag on NT (1997) Multiple Users.db Possible? (1997) A *secret* new webdna tag !!! (1999) Need relative path explanation (1997) Protect tag for large groups? (1999) [WebDNA] Moving to Sandbox broke price (2009) Include + Variables = bahh (2000)