Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103947
interpreted = N
texte = >> In the History section: >>> WebCatalog and Pacific Coast Software was purchased >> "was" should be "were" >>> set such as Object oriented programming =
>> > using the [function] and [scope] >> It's not really Object-oriented (we're not declaring classes with =20 >> embedded data and method handlers). These are more akin to =20 >> Structured Programming concepts. > > > In reading the wikipedia article on Object-oriented programming, I =20 > think we still fit in, though I agree it is not the best (or maybe =20 > traditional ) fit. I restructured the sentence noting modular =20 > programming as well. > > Particularly, read the "OOP in scripting" segment of the "Object-=20 > oriented programming" article on wikipedia. > > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, =20 > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend =20 > themselves to this idea. WebDNA is a great language but it's not object-oriented in any way. Best, Christer ************************************************************* Christer Olsson PO Box 9160 Phone +46 40 25 85 85 Ljusa Id=E9er AB SE-200 39 Malmo Fax +46 40 25 85 89 Kantyxegatan 5 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> In the History section: >>> WebCatalog and Pacific Coast Software was purchased >> "was" should be "were" >>> set such as Object oriented programming = >> > using the [function] and [scope] >> It's not really Object-oriented (we're not declaring classes with =20 >> embedded data and method handlers). These are more akin to =20 >> Structured Programming concepts. > > > In reading the wikipedia article on Object-oriented programming, I =20 > think we still fit in, though I agree it is not the best (or maybe =20 > traditional ) fit. I restructured the sentence noting modular =20 > programming as well. > > Particularly, read the "OOP in scripting" segment of the "Object-=20 > oriented programming" article on wikipedia. > > Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", etc.. > I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those items > can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, =20 > Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend =20 > themselves to this idea. WebDNA is a great language but it's not object-oriented in any way. Best, Christer ************************************************************* Christer Olsson PO Box 9160 Phone +46 40 25 85 85 Ljusa Id=E9er AB SE-200 39 Malmo Fax +46 40 25 85 89 Kantyxegatan 5 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se
Christer Olsson
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
can WC render sites out? (1997)
Web DNA... (2007)
Looking for a Manual (1997)
Nesting format tags (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Emailer setup (1997)
Forumulas.db & Variables (2002)
It just Does't add up!!! (1997)
setting cookies then redirecting? (1998)
[WebDNA] WebDNA 7 (2011)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
Wanted: More Math Functions (or, Can You Solve This?) (1997)
Autoreturn Submit? (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
[delete] problem (1997)
nesting limits? (1998)
hmmm (2006)
WEBCAT with SQL backend. Help please! (2000)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)