[WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110265
interpreted = N
texte = Looking for some feedback here... Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and WebDNA = FastCGI 7.x (Latest). I made two websites just to test what I think is too different behavior. Please try the following websites: (A) http://1.qt.dk/ (B) http://2.qt.dk/ (A) has included in the code where as (B) does = not. (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as expected. (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would be = just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when looking at = the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or wait) for = something in scenario (A). Any thoughts? /Palle= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (Daniel Meola 2013)
  8. [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
Looking for some feedback here... Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and WebDNA = FastCGI 7.x (Latest). I made two websites just to test what I think is too different behavior. Please try the following websites: (A) http://1.qt.dk/ (B) http://2.qt.dk/ (A) has included in the code where as (B) does = not. (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as expected. (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would be = just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when looking at = the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or wait) for = something in scenario (A). Any thoughts? /Palle= Palle Bo Nielsen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

ShowNext for method=POST (1997) Please.. copies of Digest for 7/29 and 7/30? (1997) woops - speed results - right subject (2002) Navigator 4.01 (1997) Emailer [cart] file names (1997) search form problem.. (1997) [WebDNA] [OT] hello (2012) access denied problem (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) math on date? (1997) URGENT: WebDNA Server Not Running (2003) Pull Down Search (2000) [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (2009) convertchars and e-mail (1998) WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems (1997) TaxTotal Problem (1997) math a various prices (1997) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997) Getting total number of items ordered (1997)