Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2013
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110282
interpreted = N
texte = If you check the webpage tests links i added, you will see very little = difference. However when apache serves statics files at disk speed, = WebDNA servers dynamic pages at RAM speed. This means that once the = "First Byte" has been delivered, WebDNA is faster than apache serving = static files, depending only on the processing power requested by your = code. In your test, the page is completely loaded in about the same = time, but it starts to load earlier with static and later with dynamic = and it makes the WebDNA page subjectively slower. Test it with objective = tools, as i did: the difference is negligible. - chris On Mar 26, 2013, at 13:23, Palle Bo Nielsen
= wrote: > But Christphe, >=20 > There is not a difference of 0.05 seconds as you state. The difference = is more like 0.5 sec on the repeated view. >=20 > /Palle >=20 >=20 > On 26/03/2013, at 09.09, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >=20 >> A is sent from apache to webdna which returns to apache after = interpretation. B is static and served from the disc, then cached. B = might be faster than A by 0.05 second. This is normal, dynamic webpages = will usually take slightly longer to deliver the "First Byte". >>=20 >> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_RM_AZ1/ >> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_QA_AYZ/ >>=20 >> - chris >>=20 >>=20 >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 21:41, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: >>=20 >>> Looking for some feedback here... >>>=20 >>> Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and = WebDNA FastCGI 7.x (Latest). >>>=20 >>> I made two websites just to test what I think is too different = behavior. >>>=20 >>> Please try the following websites: >>>=20 >>> (A) http://1.qt.dk/ >>>=20 >>> (B) http://2.qt.dk/ >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> (A) has included in the code where as (B) = does not. >>>=20 >>> (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as = expected. >>>=20 >>> (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would be = just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. >>>=20 >>> So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when looking = at the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or wait) for = something in scenario (A). >>>=20 >>> Any thoughts? >>>=20 >>> /Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
If you check the webpage tests links i added, you will see very little = difference. However when apache serves statics files at disk speed, = WebDNA servers dynamic pages at RAM speed. This means that once the = "First Byte" has been delivered, WebDNA is faster than apache serving = static files, depending only on the processing power requested by your = code. In your test, the page is completely loaded in about the same = time, but it starts to load earlier with static and later with dynamic = and it makes the WebDNA page subjectively slower. Test it with objective = tools, as i did: the difference is negligible. - chris On Mar 26, 2013, at 13:23, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: > But Christphe, >=20 > There is not a difference of 0.05 seconds as you state. The difference = is more like 0.5 sec on the repeated view. >=20 > /Palle >=20 >=20 > On 26/03/2013, at 09.09, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >=20 >> A is sent from apache to webdna which returns to apache after = interpretation. B is static and served from the disc, then cached. B = might be faster than A by 0.05 second. This is normal, dynamic webpages = will usually take slightly longer to deliver the "First Byte". >>=20 >> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_RM_AZ1/ >> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_QA_AYZ/ >>=20 >> - chris >>=20 >>=20 >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 21:41, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: >>=20 >>> Looking for some feedback here... >>>=20 >>> Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and = WebDNA FastCGI 7.x (Latest). >>>=20 >>> I made two websites just to test what I think is too different = behavior. >>>=20 >>> Please try the following websites: >>>=20 >>> (A) http://1.qt.dk/ >>>=20 >>> (B) http://2.qt.dk/ >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> (A) has included in the code where as (B) = does not. >>>=20 >>> (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as = expected. >>>=20 >>> (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would be = just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. >>>=20 >>> So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when looking = at the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or wait) for = something in scenario (A). >>>=20 >>> Any thoughts? >>>=20 >>> /Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Discounts (1998)
Changes to the List (1997)
WC2b12: Yes, Formulas.db is for real (1997)
problems with WebCat-Plugin ()
Don't know if this is a sily question... (2003)
Tags in the header (2000)
USPS - SiteBuilder (2005)
Stopping bad HTML propagation ? (1997)
Why WebMerchant not working? Please Help - More Info (1999)
Latin Characters (1998)
Emailer (WebCat2) (1997)
Hard Questions ? (1997)
international time (1997)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
WC Bulletin Board Issue (2003)
Newbie problem blah blah blah (1997)
[OT] CSS div/span (2004)
Multiple Newcarts (1996)
taxTotal (1997)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)