Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2013
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110281
interpreted = N
texte = But Christphe, There is not a difference of 0.05 seconds as you state. The difference = is more like 0.5 sec on the repeated view. /Palle On 26/03/2013, at 09.09, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > A is sent from apache to webdna which returns to apache after = interpretation. B is static and served from the disc, then cached. B = might be faster than A by 0.05 second. This is normal, dynamic webpages = will usually take slightly longer to deliver the "First Byte". >=20 > http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_RM_AZ1/ > http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_QA_AYZ/ >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 > On Mar 18, 2013, at 21:41, Palle Bo Nielsen
= wrote: >=20 >> Looking for some feedback here... >>=20 >> Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and = WebDNA FastCGI 7.x (Latest). >>=20 >> I made two websites just to test what I think is too different = behavior. >>=20 >> Please try the following websites: >>=20 >> (A) http://1.qt.dk/ >>=20 >> (B) http://2.qt.dk/ >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> (A) has included in the code where as (B) does = not. >>=20 >> (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as = expected. >>=20 >> (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would be = just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. >>=20 >> So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when looking = at the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or wait) for = something in scenario (A). >>=20 >> Any thoughts? >>=20 >> /Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
But Christphe, There is not a difference of 0.05 seconds as you state. The difference = is more like 0.5 sec on the repeated view. /Palle On 26/03/2013, at 09.09, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > A is sent from apache to webdna which returns to apache after = interpretation. B is static and served from the disc, then cached. B = might be faster than A by 0.05 second. This is normal, dynamic webpages = will usually take slightly longer to deliver the "First Byte". >=20 > http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_RM_AZ1/ > http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_QA_AYZ/ >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 > On Mar 18, 2013, at 21:41, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: >=20 >> Looking for some feedback here... >>=20 >> Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and = WebDNA FastCGI 7.x (Latest). >>=20 >> I made two websites just to test what I think is too different = behavior. >>=20 >> Please try the following websites: >>=20 >> (A) http://1.qt.dk/ >>=20 >> (B) http://2.qt.dk/ >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> (A) has included in the code where as (B) does = not. >>=20 >> (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as = expected. >>=20 >> (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would be = just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. >>=20 >> So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when looking = at the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or wait) for = something in scenario (A). >>=20 >> Any thoughts? >>=20 >> /Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Palle Bo Nielsen
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Thanks ! (1997)
Blowback and budgets. (2000)
WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997)
Problems deleting when a search field is blank... (1998)
Kaaaaahhhhhhhnnnnnnn! (1997)
WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)
Change in Host? (1999)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
nested ListWords? (2003)
[SearchString] usage (1997)
[/application] error? (1997)
Modifying order output (1997)
template includes encrypted template (1999)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Emailer errors - repost (2000)
I try hard to think positively (1998)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997)
test - list issues? (2003)
Secure Server (1997)
READFILE command? (1998)