Re: [SearchString] usage
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11637
interpreted = N
texte = Unlike the other WebDNA tags that are straight carry-overs from 1.6, [searchstring] has a similar meaning, but completely new format. Rather than outputting a human readable version of what people are searching for, [searchstring] outputs a form (method post or get) version of the entire search. This is used to build up the [shownext] links. The [searchstring] variable is only valid within a [shownext] context (see online docs for [shownext]). HOWEVER, you don't need the old-style [searchstring] anymore because all the search variables can be used individually to build up a much better version of the human readable search string.John. >I'm having trouble using [SearchString] in several situations using the >2.0f3 plug-in. > >First is in my logfile. The results pages uses this: > >[AppendFile access.log][date] [time] [SearchString] >[/AppendFile] > >But the logfile shows: > >05/27/1997 02:45:05 [SearchString] >05/27/1997 02:48:06 [SearchString] >05/27/1997 11:41:30 [SearchString] >etc. > >Why? Is [searchString] no longer supported? If so, how could I get the same >functionality for tracking user search criteria? > >The other place it doesn't work is on a results page, which outputs: > >Found 17 photos that match [searchString] and returned [numReturned] of >those items. > >Weird. It's figuring out [numFound] = 17, but not the other two WebDNA >variables. Why? > >------- >Richard Shapiro >rshapiro@infoasis.com John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing ********************************* Pacific Coast Software * Home of the Web's best 11770 Bernardo Plaza Ct. #462 * Catalog and Merchant software San Diego, CA 92128 * http://www.smithmicro.com Phone: 619-675-1106 Fax: 675-0372 *********************************
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Unlike the other WebDNA tags that are straight carry-overs from 1.6, [searchstring] has a similar meaning, but completely new format. Rather than outputting a human readable version of what people are searching for, [searchstring] outputs a form (method post or get) version of the entire search. This is used to build up the
[shownext] links. The [searchstring] variable is only valid within a
[shownext] context (see online docs for
[shownext]). HOWEVER, you don't need the old-style [searchstring] anymore because all the search variables can be used individually to build up a much better version of the human readable search string.John. >I'm having trouble using [SearchString] in several situations using the >2.0f3 plug-in. > >First is in my logfile. The results pages uses this: > >[AppendFile access.log]
[date] [time] [SearchString] >[/AppendFile] > >But the logfile shows: > >05/27/1997 02:45:05 [SearchString] >05/27/1997 02:48:06 [SearchString] >05/27/1997 11:41:30 [SearchString] >etc. > >Why? Is [searchString] no longer supported? If so, how could I get the same >functionality for tracking user search criteria? > >The other place it doesn't work is on a results page, which outputs: > >Found 17 photos that match [searchString] and returned [numReturned] of >those items. > >Weird. It's figuring out [numFound] = 17, but not the other two WebDNA >variables. Why? > >------- >Richard Shapiro >rshapiro@infoasis.com John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing ********************************* Pacific Coast Software * Home of the Web's best 11770 Bernardo Plaza Ct. #462 * Catalog and Merchant software San Diego, CA 92128 * http://www.smithmicro.com Phone: 619-675-1106 Fax: 675-0372 *********************************
John Hill
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Question re: Format command (2000)
[WebDNA] Encrypted Templates - Includes (2014)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
SQL Changes in 3.0.7? (2000)
[WebDNA] Encode cookies ONLY via "method=Base64" (2008)
WebCat.acgi from /cgi-bin/? (1997)
math on date? (1997)
AppleScript/.db (was:FTP to WebStar) (2001)
filemaker - orderfile (1997)
Emailer help....! (1997)
Payment Processors (2005)
[WebDNA] New Ownership for WebDNA! (2008)
[WebDNA] Happy New Year! (2009)
Close-to Comparison Code (1998)
any WEBCAT gurus who are also PERL proficient? (1999)
creating a ShipCosts database (1997)
Access Denied! But why? (1997)
RE: Database field limit? (1998)
RE: WebCat: Access denied, but why? (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)